Apr 212021
 

Another Boeing concept for the recovery of an S-IC stage. This used large fins with deployable drag brakes to stabilize the stage nose-down, parachutes to slow descent and sizable rocket motors for terminal braking just before splashdown. Additional rockets arrest the stages “collapse” to the side.

Would a Falcon 9-style landing have been better? Sure. But that wasn’t going to happen with 1960’s technology. A splashdown, recovery and refurbishment would have been expensive, but likely not as expensive as a brand new stage, and as has been the case with Falcon 9, as time goes by and experience grows, everything would get better and cheaper.

 

 Posted by at 9:53 pm
Apr 172021
 

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

No moon for you, Bezos.

NASA said it will award SpaceX $2.89 billion for development of the Starship vehicle and two flights. One of these missions will be an uncrewed flight test of Starship down to the lunar surface and back. The second mission will be a crewed flight—the first one of the Artemis program—down to the Moon.

Artemis is the NASA program that has been reliant upon the SLS. But by going with a Starship derivative… will SLS still be relevant? The plan apparently is to launch the Starship to lunar orbit unmanned, there to rendezvous with an SLS-launched Orion capsule to transfer crew over. But… if SpaceX has the ability to get a Starship to the moon, seems like they’ll have the ability to get at least a Dragon capsule there and back. I wonder what the payload capability would be for an Earth-to-lunar-orbit-to-Earth Starship might be given LEO refueling. Perhaps such a vehicle could send a couple dozen people to lunar orbit there to meet up with the Starship lunar lander; transfer four or five tot he lander and the rest stay in the transfer Starship, there to play tourist and pay for the trip.

 Posted by at 1:07 am
Mar 312021
 

Just released, the March 2021 rewards for APR Patrons and Subscribers. Included this month:

Diagram/art: a large format scan of an artists concept of the XC-14. This was printed with a large number of signatures; they seem to be Boeing engineers.

Document 1: “Project Hummingbird.” An FAA document summarizing the characteristics of STOL and VTOL aircraft circa 1961, including bogh built and proposed types. This was scanned from a clean original!

Document 2: “The Thor Missile Story.” Old, old, incredibly old school media… a film strip propaganda piece about the statues of the Thor IRBM.

CAD diagram: the WWII era German DFS 228 rocket powered high altitude recon plane, proposed operational version.

 

 

 

If this sort of thing is of interest, sign up either for the APR Patreon or the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program.




Because I forgot to mention the January and February rewards… subscribers/patrons got these (new subscribers can order them as back issues):

January 2021: Titan IIIC/IIIM booster rockets; CAD diagram of Post-Saturn concepts; a Convair Heavy Bombardment Airplane brochure; a fractional XF-103 mockup review and technical description; a fractional Westland paper on VTOL; a General Dynamics report on a proposed turboprop transport for Saturn stages.

February, 2021: An Aerion SST brochure; a Lockheed SST diagram; Dornbergers report on a commercial rocket powered airliner (scanned from a clean vintage copy); an early Convair jet flying boat bomber brochure; a CAD diagram comparing General Atomics’ ten-meter Orions for the USAF and NASA.

 Posted by at 5:13 pm
Mar 262021
 

Our futures are secure.

A new bill would defund new ICBMs to pay for coronavirus vaccine research

This new Congress wants to not only disarm the populace but the military as well… at least as far as strategic deterrence. I’m sure the Chinese are quaking in their boots.

If there is anyone in the FBI who’s actually interested in defending the US, I’d recommend they use the list of sponsors and supporters of this bill as the basis for an investigation into foreign influence in the US government:

The Investing in Cures Before Missiles Act, offered by Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif….

The proposed legislation has amassed some early support in the House and Senate. Co-sponsors include Sens. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; as well as Reps. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore.; Steve Cohen, D-Tenn.; Jesus Garcia, D-Ill.; Raul M. Grijalva, D-Ariz.; Jared Huffman, D-Calif.; Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas; Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.; Barbara Lee, D-Calif.; James McGovern, D-Mass.; Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C.; Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.; Mark Pocan, D-Wis.; and Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.

Note that there are some of the *dumbest* members of Congress listed there.

 Posted by at 9:35 pm
Mar 252021
 

Lighting the candles on a birthday cake by overlighting the candles:

I assume that this was nowhere near a full thrust test, likely just a low-power ignition test. Otherwise it would have vaporized the cake and the stand it was on. And then… oy. Imagine the environmental impact statements.

 Posted by at 3:59 pm
Mar 252021
 

People are still trying to either reboot or sequelize “The Last Starfighter.” That was very much a  movie of its time; the computer generated visual effects were reasonably dazzling in their day but are woefully antiquated today, and the story and characters are monumentally wide-eyed innocents compared to today’s grotty, cynical mire of sleaze and grimdark. Making a reboot of it would almost certainly be a massive failure of “Ghostbusters” and “Total Recall” and “Star Trek Discovery” proportions. But… get the right people on board, I could get behind a sequel. And it seems that some of the right people are trying:

The Last Starfighter’s Potential Sequel Now Has a Sizzle Reel for Hollywood’s Consideration

Gary Whitta, writer of The Book of Eli and Rogue One, has been working with Last Starfighter writer Jonathan Betuel on bringing the 1984 classic back to life for years now. Today, he hopped on his Twitch stream to say the film is closer than it’s ever been to fruition. It’s “right on the one-yard line” he said, and he believes it will happen.

Well, we’ll see. The “sizzle reel” is just a collection of very, very preliminary concept art, showing generic scenes of a modestly evolved version of the Gunstar, with a few showing a return to the trailer court. This would indicate a likely return of the character of Alex… *hopefully* still played by Lance Guest and with any luck at all also including Maggie played by Catherine Mary Stewart. The modern Hollywood thing to do would be to say that those two got married, had a kid, got divorced, and now their kid has fallen to the Bad Side and is leading the Bad Guys. It would be terribly politically incorrect to show them in a healthy, happy marriage with a passel of kids – now likely with kids of their own, it having been about 40 years – leading cheerful, successful lives experiencing the wonders of the universe even if they do have to face down enemies from the stars.

Sadly, three of the stars of the movie are no longer with us. Robert Preston (“Centauri”)  and Dan O’Herlihy (“Grig”) died *years* ago. And Rob Cobb, who designed the Gunstar and the Starcar and pretty  much everything else in the movie (along with doing amazing work on “Conan the Barbarian” and “Alien” and “Aliens” and a whole bunch of other stuff) died just last year. Whoever does the production design for the sequel had best be on their game.


On vaguely related matters:

Some movies like “2001” and “Forbidden Planet” need to be left the hell alone. Tinkering with them is heresy on par with knocking down statues of Lincoln or scribbling on the Constitution. Other movies… I’d pay real money to see a Revised Version with wholly updated VFX. For example, “Firefox.” That’s a movie that could benefit substantially from having all of the aerial sequences replaced with all-new footage. It’s a reasonably good spy movie as-is, if a bit on the glacially slow side, but the scenes of the Firefox in flight… uuuugh. The full scale Firefox mockup? Spectacular. Don’t touch it. But the flying scenes could be improved, and, why not, expanded. Let’s finally see the MiG 31 Firefox in all its glory.

There are other movies that are not even remotely classics, and I say “improve the frak out of ’em.” If you have seen “Meteor” in the last couple decades, you probably noticed just how half-assed the model work was. I mean… just *awful.* Even by the standards of the late 70’s, it was just embarrassingly lazy stuff. All that could be easily replaced and improved by a film student and a laptop. Imagine what a budget of, say, half a million could do.

A case can be made for doing Special Editions of episodes of the original “Battlestar Galactica” and “Buck Rogers.”

What else?

 Posted by at 3:46 pm