Jun 032012
 

‘Human barcode’ could make society more organized, but invades privacy, civil liberties

Short form: a science fiction author calls for implanting microchips in all babies. The ACLU comes out against this as a violation of basic civil liberties.

SF authors as fascist whackjobs and the ACLU on the side of individual liberty? What a world.

Granted, yes, having such implanted IDs would make a lot of things a lot easier and a lot more efficient. But history has shown that governments that desire efficiency out of their people tend to be quite horrible governments.

And if any western government tried to institute this, even as a voluntary program… holy crap. If the Obama regime thinks they’re having trouble with the Catholics, what with forcing them to pay for abortions, imagine the fun they’ll have with the entirely of Christendom if they suggest that everyone needs to get a permanent “mark.” Yowza.

 Posted by at 2:13 pm
May 282012
 

Canada’s national archives being dismantled and scattered

One the one hand, I can kinda approve… decentralizing important functions is a generally good idea, if you can do it. And since archives can be digitized, decentralization becomes easy. But then there’s this:

A generous estimate is only 4% of the LAC collection has been digitized to date — a poor record that will be made worse by the cuts announced on April 30, 2012, which reduced digitization staff by 50%.”

Errr… bad idea. Once the archive is fully scanned – at high resolution with minimal compression – then scattering it about can make sense. The last thing Canada needs is suicide bomb attacks by jihadi polar bears taking out their cultural memory.

And even after the collection is wholly scanned and decentralized, the archive will still need a knowledgeable and skilled staff. People with valid research to do will need assistance, and even Google is not an adequate replacement for a human who knows what’s what and where. Additionally, a good staff will be needed to acquire and deal with new items.

 Posted by at 7:29 am
May 262012
 

The popularity of the idea of marijuana legalization is growing… it now may have the majority of US citizens in favor of it:

56% Favor Legalizing, Regulating Marijuana

I have no use for the stuff myself (nor any use for booze or tobacco… but put a well-made cookie in front of me and WATCH OUT), but I’m all in favor of legalizing it. I’ve seen people get stond and I’ve seen people get drunk (hey, I went to college), and on the whole the stoners were safer and less annoying than the drunks. Those who smoke pot usually seem to fall into three categories:

1) Stoners. They get lethargic.

2) Regular schmoes. They get mellow.

3) People who smoke and get paranoid. Not a lot of repeat offenders in that case, I’d imagine.

But with booze, you get:

1) Happy drunks

2) Chatty drunks

3) Sad drunks

4) Mean drunks

And the last two categories, especially #4, are a greater societal problem than the stoners are by a wide margin.

But even if you still think that pot is an Evil Drug, even if you – erroneously – see it as a Gateway Drug (see NOTE), there are some damned fine reasons to still support legalization.

1) You promptly defund criminal organizations (not only local drug dealers, but also international criminal organizations like the Zeta and MS13… with the side benefit that with one of their main sources of income gone, they will be less capable of operations to smuggle cocaine, heroin, illegal aliens or other equally dangerous substances).

2) You increase tax revenues, and provide increased job opportunities here in the US for growers and others in the industry

3) You reduce the tax burden, since there are far fewer criminals to catch, try and jail

4) You can monitor and control the quality of the pot, thus reducing the risk of pot laced with other drugs, or with various toxins

5) You decriminalize the smokers. The value of this should not be underestimated: if you take an otherwise good person who likes to smoke dope and make it clear to him that he’s a criminal… he will very likely be somewhat less interested in being a Good Citizen.

And… you can help defund and defang the United States Federal Government. Why is this import? Here’s why:

Piratical feds, town police trying to take couple’s hotel

Short form: a family owned hotel (built by the current owners father in 1955) is likely to be stolen by the cops and auctioned off. Why? Because there have been thirty arrests at that hotel since 1994 on drug dealing charges… and the DEA has determined that this means that the hotel has been used to facilitate these crimes. Note that the owners are not under arrest or even under suspicion for any crime. Note that thirty arrests out of 125,000 room rentals over that time equate to an impressively small fraction. Note that the local police department is expected to receive 80% of the proceeds from the auction. Note that if the hotel is auctioned off to another hotel owner or a chain, and they continue to operate it as a hotel… then it will stand every chance of being stolen by the feds *again* at some point.

Note also that I have no idea if those thirty drug dealing arrests were all for pot, or none for pot. For all I know they were all for crystal meth. But even so, the ridiculous and fundamentally anti-American “War On Drugs” is being used by the government to ruin lives and increase its power to ruin even *more* lives.

NOTE: Whatever value pot has as a “gateway drug” it has because the only way to get it is, for most people, to go to the criminal element… just the type of people who will also try to get you hooked on other, nastier drugs.

 Posted by at 8:27 am
May 172012
 

So, Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin wants to ditch his American citizenship and wander over to Singapore. Why? Because the US federal government wants to tax the bejeebers out of his riches (which he doesn’t actually have yet), and he’ll be far richer if he *leaves* the US. So, what do idiot US Senators Chuck Schumer and Bob Casey want to do? Do they want to reform American tax laws to make them less punitive? Do they want to reform American tax laws so that, say, Singaporean billionaires will want to move here? Nope. They want to enact punitive new laws specifically to target people who realize that the US is quickly becoming a collectivist craphole. They want to find John Galt and shoot him in the head and steal all his stuff.

Senators Want to Ban Facebook’s Co-Founder from America Forever

How will this law make foreign investors or foreign citizens with big ideas want to come to the US?

Shouldn’t the issue here be that he’ll be richer somewhere other than the US… and that the US is *supposed* to be the place where your efforts are most richly rewarded?

 Posted by at 10:04 pm
Apr 242012
 

An interesting discussion of international law and the rights of private enterprise:

Does Asteroid Mining Violate Space Law?

Opinions seem to be all over the place. A quick glance seems to suggest that American legal opinion is “sure, go for it,” while non-American opinion might trend towards “no yu can’t haz.”

But it’s a weird, untested legal area. My opinion: go for it. If anyone pitches a fit… well, the true power of law enforcement lies in *enforcement.* If the UN decides that private asteroid mining is illegal… what are they gonna do about it?

A secondary benefit to the future might come about if the US decides it’s legal and the UN decides otherwise: the risk of conflict in space would increase. While this might seem to be a *bad* thing, just consider the possibilities:

Alternate Reality A – it’s legal, nobody messes with the miners, and 500 space miners ply their trade, and add a few trillio0n to the US GDP annually.

Alternate Reality B – the UN declares it illegal and tries to mess with the miners. 500 miners ply their trade and add a few trillion to the us GDP annually. A hundred UN space pirates try to mess with the miners. A hundred US Colonial Marines are permanently stationed to fight off the space pirates.

The result would be an increase in space activity. Kinda rough in the beginning, ut the exploitation of space might go faster. Of course, this would require an American government that thought that it was right and proper for American companies to make buckets of money in and from space. Fortunately, unless Planetary Resources is much further along than they’ve revealed, it will be several Presidential election cycles before they start scraping platinum off of nearby asteroids.

BONUS: It might incentivize the UN to pull up stakes from NYC and relocate to Geneva or some such. I understand that this would be just fine with most New Yorkers.

 Posted by at 6:30 pm
Apr 202012
 

The government has put the Lockheed Sea Shadow up for sale:

BID DEPOSIT-SEA SHADOW/HMB-1

Current Bid: 10,000 USD (Reserve Not Met)
Bidders: 0
Close Time: 05/04 05:00 PM CT

THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE BEING SOLD AS ONE LOT AND ARE NOT TO BE SEPARATED UNTIL AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE GOVERNMENT FACILITY. THE EX-SEA SHADOW (IX-529), YEAR BUILT: 1983, BUILDER: LOCKHEED MARTIN, OVERALL LENGTH: 164 FEET, WATERLINE LENGTH: 118 FEET, EXTREME BEAM 68 FEET, WATERLINE BEAM: 58 FEET, MAXIMUM NAVIGATIONAL DRAFT: 15 FEET, DRAFT LIMIT: 15 FEET, LIGHT DISPLACEMENT: 499 TONS, HULL MATERIAL: STEEL HULL AND SUPERSTRUCTURE, DIESEL ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEM, NUMBER OF PROPELLERS: TWO. (THE EX-SEA SHADOW SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY COMPLETELY DISMANTLING AND SCRAPPING WITHIN THE U.S.A. DISMANTILING IS DEFINED AS REDUCING THE PROPERTY SUCH AS IT HAS NO VALUE EXCEPT FOR ITS BASIC MATERIAL CONTENT.) THE EX-HUGHES MINING BARGE (HMB-1), COVERED SEMI-SUBMERSIBLE DECK CARGO BARGE/FLOATING DRY-DOCK (WITH DOCKED EX-SEA SHADOW (IX-529) ON BOARD.) HMB-1 – LIGHT DISPLACEMENT: 4,585 TONS, LENGTH OVER ALL): 234 FEET, BREATH: 106.8 FEET, DEPTH: 18.8 FEET, HEIGHT OF WING WALLS ABOVE MAIN DECK: 62 FEET, LENGTH INSIDE WING WALLS: 276 FEET, WIDTH INSIDE WING WALLS: 76.6 FEET, YEAR BUILT: 1972, DRAFT: FORWARD: 8 FEET, AFT: 9 FEET, AIR DRAFT: 97.7 FEET, BUILDER: NATIONAL STEEL SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, SAN DIEGO, CA., CONSTRUCTION: WELDED STEEL, SPOON BOW AND FLAT BOTTOM WITH 18 INCH DEAD RISE, AND RADIUS BILGE PLATING. THESE ITEMS ARE BEING SOLD AS ONE LOT AND WILL NOT BE SEPERATED.

Which of course sounds AWESOME. But they crap all over the awesomeness with this requirement:

THE EX-SEA SHADOW SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY COMPLETELY DISMANTLING AND SCRAPPING WITHIN THE U.S.A. DISMANTILING IS DEFINED AS REDUCING THE PROPERTY SUCH AS IT HAS NO VALUE EXCEPT FOR ITS BASIC MATERIAL CONTENT.

Gah. Can you imagine what kind of amazing yacht it could’ve made?

So, you’re bidding on scrap metal that *you* have to go to the bother of scrapping. Feh.

 Posted by at 3:00 pm
Mar 132012
 

… back when the Nazis killed political dissidents and called it eugenics.

How Engineering the Human Body Could Combat Climate Change

Where we get suggestions such as:

1) Slipping people drugs that make them sick when they eat meat

2) Using genetic engineering to make people smaller

3) Using drugs to make people more “altruistic”

4) Using drugs to make people not want stuff

Yeah. Awesome.

 Posted by at 7:09 pm