Aug 122011
 

Remember this bit of astonishingly effective propaganda?

This was created by one Shepard Fairey, the same artist who created the Andre the Giant “Obey” thing some years back, along with a lot of other commercial and political propaganda art. Well, seems this great warrior for Hope and Change was in Copenhagen, Denmark, to create some commissioned art. After the opening of his exposition, he got jumped and beat up. By, as it turns out, leftwingers who think he’s a sellout and part of the “Obama Illuminatti.”
Snerk.

So how’s that Hope and Change workin’ out for ya?

 Posted by at 9:35 pm
Jul 142011
 

Obama warns Cantor: ‘Don’t call my bluff’

Republicans said tense negotiations over raising the $14.3 trillion debt limit at the White House ended when President Obama stormed out of the meeting with a stern warning to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.): “Don’t call my bluff.”

Hmmm. OK, I’m not a poker player. But, correct me if’n I’m wrong, but isn’t a bluff the sort of thing you’re *not* supposed to let the other guy know is, in fact, a bluff? Wouldn’t letting the other guy know that you’re bluffing be a *dumb* thing to do?

 Posted by at 9:51 am
Jun 272011
 

Remember how the press went bonkers a few weeks ago when they declared that Sarah Palin got the history of Paul Revere wrong? Let’s see if they show the same devotion in covering this: 

[youtube k5T1Aq2tFVA]

In the first part of the video, Obama (who refers to *himself* six times in 45 seconds) gives a speech at Fort Drum on June 23rd and describes how he gave the Medal of Honor to one Jared Monti. He mentions Monti specifically because Monti was the first one “who actually came back and wasn’t receiving it posthumously.”

Then there’s the second part of the video, shot in September of 2009, where Obama presents the Medal of Honor to Jared Monti. Well… more accurately, to Jared Montis parents, since Monti was killed in action, and the award was posthumous.

It’s one thing to give an off-the-cuff muddled version of history from two and a third centuries ago of things that happened to other people. It’s quite another to give a prepared speech describing something that you yourself did in an incredibly public way less than two years ago… and get it *dead* *wrong.* And manage to dishonor the memory of a fallen CMH recipient while doing it.

 Posted by at 7:37 am
Jun 072011
 

U.S. funding for future promises lags by trillions

Some people often complain that I blather on about politics when I should just stick with obscure bits of aerospace. Well… how The Hell is the United States supposed to have any kind of aerospace industry, let alone colonize the universe, when we have politically driven financial disasters like this???

Unless the US FedGuv gets spending under control – cut spending by 50%, for starters – the US is very soon going to be relegated to the “has-been” section of history.

 Posted by at 12:21 pm
May 202011
 

Seems Barry just had himself a “teachable moment.” Sadly, it falls to a foreign politician to be the one to tell Obama not just “no,” but, in effect, “hell no, give it up, it ain’t gonna happen.” This in response to Obama’s insane statements that the wants Israel to return to its indefensible borders and give up its capitol city.

[youtube 1fUhxQRKSCk]

Oh, to be able to read Obama’s mind while he was getting schooled…

 Posted by at 2:10 pm
May 162011
 

Ever since the “Tea Party” groups got up and running in the early part of 2009, the loudest complaint against them is that they are racist. Of course, how could they not be… Obama is black, and that must be the only possible reason why anyone would oppose his fiscal polices. There is, however, one small problem with that line of reasoning. Let’s see if you, unlike the media, can spot it:

JUAN WILLIAMS: Will Herman Cain Be the Big Story of the 2012 Election?

Frank Luntz, the bestselling author and GOP pollster, held an instant focus group after the debate which overwhelmingly declared the Cain the winner. “In all the years I have been doing this, I have never seen a reaction like this to a debate.”

Cain and Hasner Win Ft. Lauderdale Tea Party Straw Poll

Herman Cain came out on top of the Presidential straw poll, with 18.5% of the first place votes.  Second and third place went to Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, respectively.  There was also a very strong showing for Representative Allen West as a write-in candidate, putting him only a little behind Paul.

Hmmm.

Herman Cain:

Allen West:

Now, look. I don’t care for Obama. Not because he’s black (or half-black, depending on the narrative being read at the time), but because he’s a socialist dumbass. Yes, there are some on the political right who are racist, who say racist things or call him racist names (“Obongo” is one I’ve seen numerous times, and every time it makes me cringe). But then, there are a lot of leftists who are quite racist. Hell, anyone who takes a look at the state of the “black family” today and determines that the Great Society programs were and remain a good idea is quite probably a racist, IMO.

But all that aside… if the Tea Partiers were a bunch of racists, why would they like Herman Cain so much? While I don’t spend too much time hanging around with Klansmen and skinheads and the like, it seems to me that while the white racists might *hate* a black feller that agrees with them politically less than they’d *hate* a black feller who disagrees with them… they’d still *hate* him, and would rather vote for the white guy, regardless of the politics.

Less relevant blather after the break:

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 12:02 pm
May 162011
 

Gates praises Obama’s call on bin Laden raid

Where US SecDef Bob Gates says: “I’ve worked for a lot of these guys and this is one of the most courageous calls — decisions — that I think I’ve ever seen a president make.”

Really? REALLY???

Hmmm. Let’s see. If the CIA comes to the POTUS and says “we know where bin Laden is, we can either kill him or not,” is there *really* that much of a decision to make? Bush caught all kinds of hell for *not* killing OBL in the Tora Bora region. Obama not ordering a raid on Osama would have been political suicide, regardless of the facts on the ground.

The only real decision Obama had to make was “aerial bombardment or up close and personal.” Even here, though, there’s not much of a decision to make. Bombardment has two possible and important *negative* outcomes:

1: He gets away, and you don’t know it

2: He doesn’t get away, but his remains get obliterated, and you don’t know if you got him.

This was not a “courageous” decision, any more than a fighter pilot in an F-18 with both engines gone and the left wing blown off makes a “courageous” decision to eject. No more courageous than someone with cancer deciding to undergo radiation treatment rather than, say, relying upon a faith healer. Sure, there are risks involved… but there really isn’t much of an option.

“But what if it had failed?” Well, then it would have failed. Hardly the first time a military operation would have failed. I can’t imagine too many people getting too upset.

This nonstop bleating about the “courage” that Obama showed in making the only decision that a President could got old ten minutes after the news broke that Osama was dead.

Was it the right call? You bet. Was it courageous? No, not really. Especially when he then turned around and started using SEAL Team Six for his own self-promotion. By letting the news out that the US had done what it did, he essentially ruined many prospects for similar raids in the future. If Pakistan were to  be taken over by the Jihadis, they have a number of nuclear weapons that the US would certainly like to “confiscate.” Before the OBL raid, SEALs and similar groups might have been able to do it. But now, the Pakistani goverment and people know to a dead certainty that the US is willing to send troops onto their turf, and have stealth helicopters with which to do it. This will *force* the Pakistani government and military to make changes that will onyl make future operations harder. Other high-value Al Queda targets in Pakistan and the rest of the region now have confirmation that the US can hunt down pretty much anybody… and that the US has a whole lot of intelligence that was captured. Rather than keeping a lid on the situation and allowing that intelligence data to be examined and perhaps used on other targets, the Obama administration instead had to “spike the football.”

 Posted by at 12:26 am
May 022011
 

I’ve not paid a whole lot of attention to the claims of the birther movement. Some of the early claims were intriguing, but the discovery of the Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements pretty much ended my interest. I’m willing to entertain a lot of ideas about leftists working to subvert the Constitution for nefarious ends (see: any gun control bill ever), but some decades long conspiracy to train some nobody baby of nobody parents to someday slime his way into the White House is way beyond believability.

That said, the recent release of Obamas birth certificate does have some oddities to it. The first, of course, is the timing: if it’s worth doing now, it was worth doing a few years ago, when the idea that Obama wasn’t born in the US first cropped up. And if he didn’t want to release it (for reasons that are murky at best), why release it at all? And why now, as opposed to, say, just before the 2012 election when it could be used to smack down a potential Trump run for President?

And then there’s this:

[youtube QNJfdKClbH4]

I don’t know squat about Adobe Illustrator. Is what this guy talking about accurate? If so, there sure do seem to be some weirdnesses with the birth certificate that would seem to indicate that it’s a digital forgery.

And if it is… why? Seems to me if the White House went to the effort to fake up a birth certificate, they’d take an extra five minute to print out a high quality paper version of it, then scan that. Releasing a birth certificate that has easily discovered digital “fingerprints” is beyond lazy. So, what possible explanations would there be for this?

UPDATE: Check the comments for a plausible, indeed probable, explanation for why the text is on a separate layer from the background.

 Posted by at 6:20 pm