Apr 072021
 

There are lots of people fairly far apart on a number of important issues. It is wisest, when trying  to figure out what to do about The Other Side, to have an *actual* understanding of The Other Side. When your understanding of them is limited not only to bumper sticker statements, but strawman bumper stickers, you will not only fail to truly understand The Other Side, you will come off as an idiot not only to The Other Side but also to potential allies who actually understand The Other Side. Anyone on the right who has listened to lefties bloviating about right wingers being “Nazis” or “Fascists” or “racists” will know this. Any non-religious person who has listened to a preacher or an imam or just some idjit going on about how non-believers *really* *do* actually believe in some god or other, they just pretend not to so they can behave immorally, will know this. Anyone who knows by not just education but experience that the Earth is spherical-ish and has listened to Flat Earthers blather on about a conspiracy  to keep the Truth hidden, will know this. Anyone who owns and respects firearms and has heard idiots going on about how the only purpose of an AR-15 is to murder people will know this.

Communism died three decades ago. Or at least it should have when the Soviet Union went down, dragged into the abyss by the weight of the chains that socialism forged and draped around its neck. But thirty years later… here we are, still having to contend with the most destructive economic ideology of the last millenium. Why? What could actually appeal to people about an economic system that revolves around slavery, theft and the stifling of the human spirit? Is it because those touting it are crazy, or stupid, or just young and naive?  Sure, all possible. But… why not ask? Someone did, and the answers are so balls-to-the-wall bizarre that it’s clear that at least some such people, and some of us other people, will *never* see eye to eye. Hell, even agreeing to disagree might be a challenge. But it’s best to see where they come from. Behold:

What do communists want?

Alexander Finnegan, J.D. Law, Marxist Leninist
“People don’t want to cooperate. You will have to use violence to stop those who resist having their riches nationalized. You will have to fill up the prisons with people who refuse to pay their taxes,” I hear. If a bunch of insulin manufacturing executives take up arms to prevent the people from nationalizing the industry and saving lives by bringing down the cost of insulin, then if violence is used to resist their violence, why is this a moral problem for me? I would enjoy smashing them. It would mean justice is done. Same thing with putting those who don’t pay taxes in jail. Why is this controversial? How is it different anywhere else? And yes, Marxist classes would be required, so the people can learn to be more prosocial and less selfish. China has them and they are a great idea.
Huh. He’s up front about wanting “re-education camps” and to use violence in order to take your stuff.
No, I don’t feel sorry for the kulaks. They killed many families during their riots. They slaughtered half the livestock used to farm the land. They hid grain to speculate on prices, knowing people were starving. They encouraged others to stop growing grain, which would have made the famine worse. They deserved it. In this photo Soviet workers found them hiding grain. The kulaks deserve what they got.
The kulaks, you may remember, were relatively small land owners and farmers. “Private owners of the means of production.” They resisted having their stuff stolen. They were slaughtered. This guy would seem to approve of doing the same to any American farmer who would resist having his home and livelihood stolen. By the standards of the early Soviet Union, a Kulak today would be someone who ran a *very* small home-based business.
If anything, under socialism people would work harder knowing their bosses aren’t getting rich from the unpaid value of their labor, while they survive on food stamps because they are getting ripped off so badly.
He actually seems to believe that people would work harder when they know that doing so would not only not earn them more, it wouldn’t even earn them the *chance* to earn more. People would just work harder… because.
Democracy stinks. Studies have shown there is no relationship between what the public wants and policy enactment. Zero. American style representative democracy is a farce. The rich own the politicians. At least in China they have a functional and well run government that plans the economy and is doing a good job.
That’s neat. If you like how the Chinese are genociding the Uighurs, you’ll love *this* guys vision of a proper government.
No, Joseph Stalin wasn’t a monster. No, he didn’t cause the Holomodor, he didn’t kill 60 million people, he didn’t become besties with Hitler, the kulaks deserved it, and the purges were not a cynical attempt by him to grab power. The people voted for the purges and wanted them.
Ayup.
If you have a bunch of time and a bunch of excess brain cells to kill, go and read the rest of it. Like many Communists, this guy goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on. Like many Communists, his idea of dealing with people is to lecture them into oblivion (and if that doesn’t work, I guess lining them up against a wall might be ok too). But note that when he trots out horrific notions, it’s not a matter of accidentally saying the quiet part out loud. No, he’s open and clear that he wants to take your stuff and your land and your factory. He certainly seems ok with the idea of killing you to take them.
Following his screed, there are numerous other answers to the question “What do communists want?” from numerous other communists. They are generally pretty open about their desires. It is a mishmash of power fantasy and a stunning disregard for the basic human desire to own and control the products of your own mental and physical labor, to live as *you* wish, not as some government tells you to. As nightmarish as their desires are… there they are, for anyone to see.
 Posted by at 10:52 pm
Apr 022021
 

So a left wing propaganda outlet called “Earther” is outraged that Mike Rowe of “Dirty Jobs” fame has a new show:

Mike Rowe’s New Discovery+ Show Is Big Oil-Funded Propaganda

The show in question is called “Six Degrees,” and from “Earthers” description it sounds like a new version of the old BBC/James Burke series “Connections.” I watched the hell out of Connections back in the day (along with Connections 2, Connections 3 and The Day The Universe Changed), because not only was Burke a hell of a presenter/science popularizer, the idea of the show was great: how did some seemingly random event, discovery or invention hundreds or thousands of years ago lead to some important technology or process in use today. Show was friggen awesome, and I remain ticked off that it’s not available in any reasonable form today, apart from some of the episodes scattered across YouTube.

Anyway, the leftist fanatics at “Earther” are outraged that “Six Degrees” is funded by the petrochemical industry and that Rowe points out in apparently every episode that hydrocarbons are vital to todays world. Well… duh. Power comes largely from fossil fuels. Propulsion comes almost entirely from fossil fuels. Our *stuff* is often made directly from petrochemicals, as are our medicines and lubricants and insulators. The wind turbines that these yahoos want to supplant natural gas and coal fired plants? Made from carbon composites and fiberglass made from petrochemicals. If you want to tell the story of how the modern world got built and maintained, you have to give it up to the petrochemical industry… or be a liar.

The article shills for solar and wind… and make ZERO mention of nuclear. The article excoriates the American petrochemical industry for “frying the planet,” but makes ZERO mention of the fact that the US has flattened CO2 output, while India is catching up and China has more than doubled US output. In 2017, the US was responsible for a mere 13.77% of the total planetary output of CO2 (doubtless substantially lower still today). But by all means, let’s focus on Mike Rowe’s little TV show rather than the ENTIRE PLANET burning everything under the sun.

 

ADDENDUM: Turns out that Connectiosn 1,2 and 3 are available in their entirety at the Internet Archive:

Connections by James Burke (Seasons 1-3)

 Posted by at 12:21 pm
Mar 302021
 

So about 2 weeks ago I posted yet another YouTube video that appropriated one of my diagrams without attribution. I sent the video maker emails asking about it, but received no response. Now, I have *no* problem with people using my diagrams to illustrate articles, books, videos, etc. about those subjects; all I ask is attribution. Hell, I don’t even demand *money*, just… let readers & viewers know where ya got it… and asking in advance is just common courtesy.

These diagrams are copyrighted; they are a sizable fraction of my income. It was pointed out to me that if you don’t make an effort to protect your copyright, you can *lose* that copyright. So, I took the one option that was available to me: I filed a copyright complaint with YouTube. I didn’t expect much to come of it, but, lo and behold, this is what you get if you spool up the video today:

The copyright strike takedown system gave the video maker a full week to fix the issue. A fix that could have been made by simply adding a note in the description of the video. But… no such effort was made. I never heard a thing from the maker. So a video with a few hundred thousand views went *poof.* This baffles me: surely YouTube must have in some way informed the video maker about the complaint in progress, the looming takedown? If so and the creators blew it off… well, that’s on them. But if YouTube didn’t inform them, that would seem to be on YouTube. I’ve heard a lot of complaints from video creators about the copyright strike system, so maybe that’s it.

For future reference: if you want to use one of my diagrams in one of your products, do two things:

1: Ask in advance… I’ll almost certainly say “yes.”

2: Say where the diagram came from… “Scott Lowther” or “US Bomber Projects” or “aerospaceprojectsreview.com.” It’s not that hard.

If you take one of my diagrams and incorporate it in a way that makes it come off as *your* work, though, I will take offense.

 Posted by at 2:35 pm
Mar 252021
 

People are still trying to either reboot or sequelize “The Last Starfighter.” That was very much a  movie of its time; the computer generated visual effects were reasonably dazzling in their day but are woefully antiquated today, and the story and characters are monumentally wide-eyed innocents compared to today’s grotty, cynical mire of sleaze and grimdark. Making a reboot of it would almost certainly be a massive failure of “Ghostbusters” and “Total Recall” and “Star Trek Discovery” proportions. But… get the right people on board, I could get behind a sequel. And it seems that some of the right people are trying:

The Last Starfighter’s Potential Sequel Now Has a Sizzle Reel for Hollywood’s Consideration

Gary Whitta, writer of The Book of Eli and Rogue One, has been working with Last Starfighter writer Jonathan Betuel on bringing the 1984 classic back to life for years now. Today, he hopped on his Twitch stream to say the film is closer than it’s ever been to fruition. It’s “right on the one-yard line” he said, and he believes it will happen.

Well, we’ll see. The “sizzle reel” is just a collection of very, very preliminary concept art, showing generic scenes of a modestly evolved version of the Gunstar, with a few showing a return to the trailer court. This would indicate a likely return of the character of Alex… *hopefully* still played by Lance Guest and with any luck at all also including Maggie played by Catherine Mary Stewart. The modern Hollywood thing to do would be to say that those two got married, had a kid, got divorced, and now their kid has fallen to the Bad Side and is leading the Bad Guys. It would be terribly politically incorrect to show them in a healthy, happy marriage with a passel of kids – now likely with kids of their own, it having been about 40 years – leading cheerful, successful lives experiencing the wonders of the universe even if they do have to face down enemies from the stars.

Sadly, three of the stars of the movie are no longer with us. Robert Preston (“Centauri”)  and Dan O’Herlihy (“Grig”) died *years* ago. And Rob Cobb, who designed the Gunstar and the Starcar and pretty  much everything else in the movie (along with doing amazing work on “Conan the Barbarian” and “Alien” and “Aliens” and a whole bunch of other stuff) died just last year. Whoever does the production design for the sequel had best be on their game.


On vaguely related matters:

Some movies like “2001” and “Forbidden Planet” need to be left the hell alone. Tinkering with them is heresy on par with knocking down statues of Lincoln or scribbling on the Constitution. Other movies… I’d pay real money to see a Revised Version with wholly updated VFX. For example, “Firefox.” That’s a movie that could benefit substantially from having all of the aerial sequences replaced with all-new footage. It’s a reasonably good spy movie as-is, if a bit on the glacially slow side, but the scenes of the Firefox in flight… uuuugh. The full scale Firefox mockup? Spectacular. Don’t touch it. But the flying scenes could be improved, and, why not, expanded. Let’s finally see the MiG 31 Firefox in all its glory.

There are other movies that are not even remotely classics, and I say “improve the frak out of ’em.” If you have seen “Meteor” in the last couple decades, you probably noticed just how half-assed the model work was. I mean… just *awful.* Even by the standards of the late 70’s, it was just embarrassingly lazy stuff. All that could be easily replaced and improved by a film student and a laptop. Imagine what a budget of, say, half a million could do.

A case can be made for doing Special Editions of episodes of the original “Battlestar Galactica” and “Buck Rogers.”

What else?

 Posted by at 3:46 pm
Mar 172021
 

Ghana will no longer export cocoa to Switzerland

Ghana wants to stop exporting raw cocoa, and instead export finished chocolate. According to THIS, Ghana is responsible for 57% of Switzerlands cocoa, so this would pose a serious issue for the Swiss chocolate industry (and probably a lot of other countries chocolate industries as well, since Ghana produces 45% of the worlds cocoa…though Wiki says they’re responsible for only 18%). Ghana is of course taking a risk: if their home grown chocolate sucks, then they will have spent a lot building infrastructure, will have lost raw cocoa sales, and won’t sell much processed chocolate. Even if it doesn’t suck, it won’t be Swiss chocolate, and that matters to a lot of people for whom this sort of thing matters.

One is left to wonder what the Swiss will do. They import north of 44,000 tons of cocoa, and would have to start looking for alternative sources. Ecuador and Mexico and the like would probably want to step up, unless they, too, decide that processing it locally makes sense.

Growing the cocoa there in Switzerland seems unlikely due to the cocoa tree being a distinctly tropical plant. Still: it might make sense to try for local production. It might make sense for Switzerland to not only try growing cocoa trees in hothouses (possibly in warrens of tunnels carved through the hills and mountains), but also via hydroponics, though genetic manipulation (get coca beans growing on vines or something, or from mutant peanut or taters, I dunno) or even purely synthetically. If Switzerland can pull this off, they’ll be not only independent of reliance upon volatile third world imports and politics, they’ll have new agricultural technologies and techniques to sell. The developed world could, say, turn skyscrapers into high-tech farms for the production of spices and such that are currently produced only in equatorial regions. At last the modern world could divorce itself from dependency upon the third world, not only ending the need to send them our money, but also ending the heartache of the poverty stricken folks of the undeveloped countries knowing that evil westerners are appropriating their cultures. Imagine the joy that would spread through the cocoa farmers of Ghana as they saw their exports of cocoa dry up utterly, their farms returning to a state of nature, as they know that they are no longer participating in the evil Europeans appropriation of Aztec culture.

A notion: an early product of asteroid mining could be Island Three habitats given over entirely to the production of “luxury” raw agricultural materials. There would have to be a thriving trade in water and carbon and such going *to* the habs to counter the raw materials going down, but this would only serve to make space flight all that much cheaper. A secondary – and probably necessary – product of the asteroid mining would be the silica processed out of the asteroids. This could be dropped from low orbit  in the form of “cannonballs” a meter or two in diameter as a gentle incentive for the refugee boats full of starving Ghanaian cocoa farmers to turn back.

The Swiss chocolate industry is already in trouble enough thanks to the Pinko Pox, with revenues down more than 10%. That works out to a loss of more than $400 million… and that’s based just on a decrease in tourism. Imagine what it’ll be when their supply of cocoa starts getting rather thin. Billions of dollars could fund some interesting new technologies, all of which would be useful not only for chocolatiers but for modern mankind as a whole. The daily Lindt-SpaceX shuttle to the ChocoHab in geosynchronous orbit could make for an inspiring sight.

 Posted by at 7:40 pm
Mar 142021
 

Long ago when I was in high school I had a subscription to Analog science fiction magazine. Once a month it would show up and I’d greedily read it from cover to cover. Much of what I read just sorta fluttered away over the decades, but a few things stuck with me to some degree or another. One story returned to me a year or two ago, but it has only been within the last day that I bothered to go through my late-80’s collection of Analogs to find it, and find it I did.

In the October 1987 issue of Analog is “Worldwreckers” by Lawrence M. Janifer. It’s a short story, told in a fairly light manner, set some time in the distant-ish future. A bunch of people have become concerned about the species known as the Langatiarans; not that these pyramidal jelly-like entities are becoming a threat to the galaxy, but because they have, rather suddenly, lost all interest in sex. Intellectually and emotionally they are much like humans, including having only the two genders… and there have been no detectable environmental changes that have caused this single-planet species to suddenly lose interest in the reproductive act. Within ninety years, the species will go extinct since they aren’t breeding anymore. By the end, the hero of the tale has discovered that a subtle electromagnetic field has encompassed the planet that turns off the Langatiaran sex drive. A generator is discovered, which promptly dissolves itself, leaving no evidence; a counter-field is set up and the jelly pyramids suddenly rediscover the joys of making little jelly pyramids.

They don’t discover *who* set up the field generator, but it is clearly someone smart and malicious. Someone wants to commit genocide quietly and without fuss. If someone started dropping nukes on the planet, not only would it wreck the place, it would be obvious, and everyone would fight back. But if the population simply lost interest in propagating the species… the species would fade away with a shrug.

That’s… huh.

Young men are giving up on sex to play video games, study finds

The issue of The Young Uns losing interest in the opposite sex has been vexing the likes of Japan for quite a while now; their birth rate is far below replacement level. The entire western world is well below replacement; even in the United States, our rise in population is largely due to an influx of of immigrants, not baby-making. Why have we drastically lost interest in reproducing ourselves? Reasons are normally given such as people living with their parents longer (which hardly stopped babymaking centuries ago when people lived several generations deep in small, cramped hovels), or economic factors (did the birth rate plummet during FDRs Depression?). But there are other potentially more disturbing partial explanations.

1: Maybe electronic entertainment, from games to naughty videos, really are more interesting than sex. Sex, after all, is something that has been genetically programmed into us over a few hundred million years… but electronic entertainment is something that has been specifically and scientifically laser-focused on grabbing our attention. Anyone who has ever been in a modern casino has seen the hordes of zombies sitting at the machines robotically feeding cash into them, their brains lit up and locked in on the blinking lights and happy beeping sounds. The human brain can be enthralled, and some people are well trained in the techniques.

2: There has been a several decades long effort to demoralize specifically the men of the west. Everywhere you look there’s something telling you that you are awful because you’re a male, or your culture doesn’t matter. WHY that has been happening, or who is behind it – if indeed anyone is really actually behind it – is less important to the discussion than what the end result of constant non-stop demoralization will be. The depressed and downhearted don’t tend to breed like bunnies.

3: Social Justice activism seems correlated with the loss of interest in reproducing as well. Behold THIS and THIS, for example, to which there is really only one reaction for a normal man. Even for those who do not sterilize themselves, a lot of the SJW “uniform” is calculated to make females wholly unattractive to normal males. Not only do many modern SJW feminists just *look* awful, they *are* awful, screeching hate-filled  ragemonsters. When presented with this as a dating option, many normal males will naturally decide that staying home to play Call Of Duty or D&D makes a *lot* more sense. How many normal people want to hang around with shrieking nutjobs who hate you?

4: A related issue of the Curse of Wokeness is the loss of masculinity, both culturally and in actual fact. Even the Chinese have noted it and seem to want to do something about it. This is an objectively measurable problem; testosterone levels and sperm counts are rapidly decreasing. Surely a lot of that is due to environmental factors… maybe pollution, maybe plastics used in food, maybe the presence of birth control (and other) hormones in the water supply, maybe changes in diet and that fact that we’ve gotten a whole lot tubbier. But there is an alternate view: how much of a man’s testosterone level is driven by what they *choose* to be? If you naturally have low testosterone, you’re unlikely to be a Manly Man or to have a drive to become a Manly Man. But if your hormone levels are naturally normal but you have been twisted by a farked-up society to believe that actually being a Man is bad, and that you’d rather be a Nu-Male in order to curry favor from your Social Betters, will that drive down your testosterone levels as your  self worth is also driven down while your sense of  self-hatred and paradoxical smugness are driven upwards?

 

For the species to continue, men have to find women attractive, women have to find men attractive, and they have the be both willing and able to do something about it. There is a creeping and now clearly obvious  movement in some especially loud segments of society to make men and women unattractive to each other and uninterested in each other. Hell, there are those pushing *hard* to convince as many men as possible that they aren’t actually men, and as many women as possible that they’re not actually women. These people are unlikely to breed successfully if they go on hormone blocker and especially if they go under the knife. If they change their minds later… too bad, too late. Transaktion T4 cannot be reversed.

Are we being beset by advanced aliens who want to genocide humanity without damaging the environment or blowing up the cities? Seems very, very unlikely. If western society falls due to the decline of the native populations, the colonizing forces from the third world will be happy to move right in and have as many babies as possible. Total human population levels are unlikely to truly decline, especially if western societies are subsumed within others. The cult of woke supremacy won’t long survive within cultures that simply throw such people off rooftops.

There probably aren’t aliens out there doing this to us. But there clearly *are* worldwreckers among us who are doing their bit – through “social justice” activism, through tainting the food supply with chemical garbage, through disdain for men and science and engineering and civilization – to see to it that babies become a rarer and rarer sight. Perhaps they should be called out as the worldwreckers they are.

 Posted by at 5:13 pm
Mar 142021
 

So there’s a new SF series on NBC called “Debris.” It proceeds from an intriguing premise: three years ago, an alien spacecraft was spotted heading into the solar system. Six months ago, debris from that spacecraft – which had clearly been trashed – begins raining down on earth. These bits, from pebble-size to car-sized, bring with them Weird Physics. Government agencies around the world are running around scooping this stuff up.

This summary holds a lot of potential. Mystery. Intrigue. Hard sci-fi. Wonder. Cosmic horror. The potential for war among competing nations, the prospect of optimism due to new science and technology.

But what do we actually get? The same emotional crap that has ruined essentially all the other network sci-fi shows over the last decade or more. Remember “Terra Nova?” Premise: it’s a few hundred years in the future, the world is a horrible political and environmental dystopia, but a doorway to the Cretaceous is discovered and a colony is sent back in time to try to re-start human civilization among the dinosaurs. Potential: extremely high. What did we get: teen angst and family drama. Bah.

More recently there was “Salvation:” a giant asteroid or comet is spotted heading towards earth. In a few years the whole planet will be wiped out. Fortunately, fake Elon Musk has himself a rocket ship able to transport a small colony of humans to Mars. Potential: very high. What did we get? Interpersonal drama, emotional baggage. Bah.

I watched the first two episodes of “Debris,” and both revolved around bits of the alien wreckage manifesting fake humans in order to let people let go of their emotional troubles. Bah. This garbage is from the same school of writing that has turned superhero comic books into episodes of the “heroes” getting emotional validation from random strangers and their peers, rather than manning the frak up and doing the job because it needs doing. I won’t be watching episode three.

 

 Posted by at 12:35 am
Mar 042021
 

A hit piece on Elon Musk and his plans for Mars:

Mars Is a Hellhole

The money quote:

Sagan did believe in sending humans to Mars to first explore and eventually live there, to ensure humanity’s very long-term survival, but he also said this: “What shall we do with Mars? There are so many examples of human misuse of the Earth that even phrasing the question chills me. If there is life on Mars, I believe we should do nothing with Mars. Mars then belongs to the Martians, even if [they] are only microbes.”

Musk, by contrast, is encouraging a feeling of entitlement to the cosmos—that we can and must colonize space, regardless of who or what might be there, all for a long-shot chance at security.

Huh. There’s a fair amount to disagree with here.

Firstly, Sagan, much as I like a lot of what he did, was wrong about the microbes. If there are Martian microbes… great, wonderful, huzzah. If they do not pose a threat to terrestrial life – and they probably wouldn’t – then the proper place for them in the future is in the Marsopolis Public Zoo And Museum. Life on Mars had its shot. The planet is dying, if not already dead; if Mars is to become a living world, it will be because humans do it. Microbes do not have rights; they certainly do not have the right to Mars that even *rabbits* do.

Now, if the author wants to get into a debate about what right to life alien microbes have, I can put her in touch with some folks who have some things to say about the right to life of human embryos.That, I suspect, would make for some entertaining debating.

Secondly, her dismissal of Musks notions about colonizing Mars: the man is right. We, especially the Western World, more especially America, *should* feel entitled to the cosmos. Whenever I hear some woke MFer tell me to “stay in my lane,” my immediate response is “Lady, I’m an American: the entire accessible universe is my lane. See you on Titan, chump!”

Everywhere we look in the heavens we see resources free for the taking. And everywhere we look – at least so far – we see no sign of those resources being owned. It’s a universe of riches and possibilities, and it is, so far as we can tell, friggen’ empty. It’s not just our right to colonize, commercialize, industrialize and exploit, it’s our responsibility. Everywhere we go for the most mundane or venal reasons, we will take along the ecosystem of Earth, or at least some fraction thereof. We will spread life throughout the cosmos.

Woke nags like this sure as hell won’t, though.

Legitimate reasons exist to feel concerned for long-term human survival, and, yes, having the ability to travel more efficiently throughout the solar system would be good. But I question anyone among the richest people in the world who sells a story of caring so much for human survival that he must send rockets into space. Someone in his position could do so many things on our little blue dot itself to help those in need.

To laugh at Sagan’s words is to miss the point entirely: There really is only one true home for us—and we’re already here.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhgh. Do I have to trot out Tsiolkovsky?

There was only one true home for us… the Olduvai Gorge. Until it wasn’t.

And note how she seems to think that *she* should be able to tell Musk how to spend his money. How many billionaires are there on Earth who *aren’t* spending their funds on building rockets? How many middle east oil billionaires are blowing far more than Musk is on SpaceX on truly useless self-aggrandizing crap? Why isn’t the author over yonder protesting the building – often with virtual slave labor – of vast and rather silly skyscrapers in the desert, or giant artificial island complexes? Why aren’t these billionaires instead following Israeli leads and making their deserts bloom?

Nah. Easier to whine about rockets because reasons.

I truly hope that Martian colonial craft will have names like “the Cecil Rhodes” and “the Rudyard Kipling.”

 Posted by at 8:19 pm
Mar 022021
 

Soon to compete with SpaceX, the Rocket Lab “Neutron.” Building on their relatively dinky Electron, the Neutron will be able to orbit 8 metric tons (including manned payloads) and will feature a reusable first stage much akin to the Falcon 9 first stage.

It looks to be substantially stubbier than Falcon 9 which should make it much more stable on the landing pad which will likely be a ship or platform out at sea.

Rocket Lab is technically an American company, but the founder is a New Zealander and many launches occur from there as well. Much of the Electron manufacturing occurs in New Zealand; the 3D-printed rocket engines are made in California.

Rocket Lab, like SpaceX before it, should cause many, MANY heads to hang in shame. Who? Well, let’s start with the likes of Boeing and Lockheed. Those titans of the aerospace world should have had this sort of capability *decades* ago. But they chose not to. And the best they’ve come up with is the as-yet unflown “Vulcan,” which is *lame* comparatively. Who else? Oh… how about the United Kingdom? They used to have a planet-spanning empire. They used to have a pretty snazzy launch vehicle of their own, the Black Arrow… which they abandoned fifty years ago. And now New Zealand has not only surpassed *all* of the British Empire with their Electron (dinky as it it, its payload still exceeds that of the Black Arrow), if the Neutron comes along – which there’s no reason to suppose it won’t, though the initial launch date of 2024 might prove optimistic – then the UK will look *even* *worse.*

If Neutron works, then there’ll be no excuses whatsoever. Every nation on the planet *should* have their own launch capability… and in a number of cases, such as the US, their should be *dozens* of new launch vehicles competing to prove who can launch the most for the least.

 

 Posted by at 2:25 pm
Feb 262021
 

First the good news: I watched the pilot episode of “Superman & Lois” and… it was *actually* *good.* It is not the usual Superman storyline; Clark Kent and Lois Lane have been married for near on to two decades at this point and have to teenage sons. The sons are of course non-canonical, but it works and is a perfectly cromulent extrapolation of the characters. The plot, acting and dialog were pretty good; the VFX were top notch. One scene that I thought was particularly well done was when Clark Kent gets a devastating phone call that causes him to dash across the continent in seconds. It was simple, but it worked.

I will continue to watch the show with interest, which is far more than any of the other CW shows can boast.

BUT THEN…

A Superman Solo Film Is on the Way From Ta-Nehisi Coates and J.J. Abrams

Oh, goodie. A race hustler and the guy who almost single-handedly set both Star Wars and Star Trek on the roads to ruin joining forces to turn one of the oldest American sci-fi IP’s into hot garbage.

I have a plot idea. Feel free to run with it. Hollywood: feel free to steal this plot and spend $200 million making it.

So, it turns out that Lex Luthor is the bagrillionaire behind the scenes puppetmastering various nefarious schemes, a process decades old. One of his leading efforts: manipulation of the press. Specifically: whenever a cop is involved in any tenuous way with the death of a black suspect, the press – under Luthors hidden influence – runs inaccurate stories calculated to drive up rage and violence. The BLM/Antifa riots and insurrections are being driven by Luthors schemes; aiming to sow as much chaos as possible in order to destroy faith in the government, police, institutions and America as a whole. Part of this is seeing to it that major political parties nominate senile old kiddie-sniffers and incompetent diversity hires for major offices. Part of it is manipulation of the tax code to make sure that major corporations offshore their operations; this not only unemploys millions of Americans but empowers the Chinese Communist government, further driving down the American publics faith in the government. Part of this is funding crackpots to infiltrate colleges, universities, high schools, middle schools, pre-schools and HR departments, filling them with anti-science, anti-engineering rigor, anti-objectivity nonsense so that STAR Labs and WayneTech and the like are starved of competent talent.

Superman, aided by a dark detective from Gotham City, finds all this out. But what Luthor is doing isn’t strictly illegal. So Superman goes to the public with what he’s learned… and he is promptly cancelled by the woke mob. Twitter and Facebook deplatform Superman for spreading politically incorrect “disinformation.” He is declared a Nazi and a white supremacist after he puts out a fire at a science fiction bookstore at the latest arsonriot.

Movie ends as Superman sadly says “I don’t want to live on this planet anymore” and flies off into the sky to find somewhere less insane and stupid. Post-credit scene: Luthor is now President of the US. The woke mob celebrates… for about five minutes, and then Luthor turns on them.

 Posted by at 8:13 pm