Apr 062013
 

You know what’s more dangerous than a gun? A nut with a gun. What’s more dangerous than a nut with a gun? An anti-gun nut with a gun.

‘Mayor Against Illegal Guns’ Arrested In Gun-Related Incident

The details are entertaining.

James Schiliro,  mayor of Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, apparently had one of his cops bring a 20-year-old male to his home, where he got said minor liquored-up and tried to make the Republican With Two Backs with him. When the kid chose to not be involved, the mayor reportedly pulled out a pistol and fired it into the floor (or maybe the wall) to force the guy to play along.

Superfun: the mayors 13-year old daughter was home at the time.

 Posted by at 5:02 pm
Apr 032013
 

Pentagon Running Out of U.S. Suppliers of Energetic Materials

Down to single or no domestic sources on 181 important energetic materials. Earlier reports mentioned materials such as lead azide (used in detonators), calcium silicide (used in smoke generators, infrared decoys, explosive bolts and others), triaminotrinitrobenzene (an explosive used in plastic explosives and possibly nuclear warheads). Presumably the full list contains materials needed for explosives and rocket propellants.

Rememember when the USA was actually able to make stuff?

 Posted by at 11:40 am
Mar 262013
 

On the one hand, it’s hard to be hard on Mark Kelly for becoming an anti-gun-nut. His wife was plugged in the noggin by a wacky leftist schizophrenic, after all… that’s gotta mess you up. But then, as he goes publicity seeking a few weeks ago, he wound up buying an Evil Black AR-15 Assault Murder Weapon *and* a .45 1911-style pistol (had Jared Laughner had one of those instead of a weenie 9mm, Gabbie would *not* have survived her gunshot):

Gabby Giffords’yHusband Buys AR-15

But then yesterday, whatever plans he had for his AR-15, whether plinking, home defense or political theater, turned into garbage when the gun store cancelled the sale and gave him his money back:

Gun store rescinds Mark Kelly’s rifle purchase, questions his ‘intent’

And while Mark Kelly and Gabby Giffords await the launch of the USS Gabby Giffords, a brand-new Independence class littoral combat ship (continuing the long, proud tradition of cynically naming Naval vessels after *living* politicians), Mark Kelly and his daughter wander down to the California seashore for a relaxing day at the beach… where they lose control of their High Capacity Assault Dog, and it goes and kills a defenseless baby sea lion:

Giffords’ husband pulls dog off sea lion in Calif.

(If you must, HERE is the YouTube video of the incident. Note that there is definite NSFW language, plus rather disturbing footage of a dog killing a baby sea lion. Lots of blood, and an abandoned baby sea lion carcass sadly floating out to sea.).

Note that in California, killing a sea lion is Bad Legal News. Will Kelly and/or his daughter be hauled up on charges like your average schmoe with an Assault Dog would be? It seems not. Also note, the way the headline is written makes it sound at first like Mark Kelly tried heroically to save the sea lion from the dog, when in fact the dog was apparently his (or at least his daughters) responsibility.

 Posted by at 2:12 am
Mar 242013
 

Missing virus vial raises concerns at UTMB facility

Where we read that a vial of “Guanarito” virus has gone missing from a laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch.

Guanarito” is also known by the name “Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever” and has a fatality rate of 23%. What’s extra-special is that Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever is spread through “aerosolized dissemination,” which typically means “sneezing.” A secondary meaning of the term is “hey, this stuff would make a great bio-weapon, sprayed out of a can on a train, bus or plane.”

 Posted by at 11:23 pm
Mar 222013
 

I don’t have any more information than what’s contained in this one extremely thin little PR announcement:

Senator Lee to Offer Amendment Tonight to Ban Most Gun Control in the Senate

…later tonight, Senator Mike Lee of Utah intends to offer an amendment to the budget resolution that would prohibit any gun control legislation which does not have a 2/3 vote in the Senate.

I’d like it to be true. I’d like it to pass. But I suspect that, at best, it’s a little bit of political theater that’ll simply get wiped away.

A rule that makes *any* new federal law or regulation that infringes upon basic rights contingent upon requiring a 2/3 majority seems like a good idea to me.

 Posted by at 3:50 pm
Mar 142013
 

Senator Cruz questions Senator Feinstein, who refuses to answer the question. Not that it’ll help, but it’s instructive to witness the fecklessness of the fascists in the US FedGuv like Feinstein as they try desperately to avoid the implications of what they are attempting to foist upon the people.

[youtube NYI3MEhegvQ]

 Posted by at 7:05 pm
Mar 132013
 

Every time I hear a politician or talking head yammer on about how “compromise” is an unalloyed good, I get a twitch in my left eye. Compromise is very often *not* a good thing. If I’m swimming in the ocean and a shark wants to eat me, what’s the compromise? That it just eats my leg? If I’m a Jew and the anti-Semite wants to kill me and my family, what’s the compromise… that they just take the female members?

No, sometimes one position is just wrong, and no compromise with them should be made. And very often, repeated compromise doesn’t end with each side with half, but with one side with nothing.

A good little tale via the LawDog Files:

Let’s say I have this cake. It is a very nice cake, with “GUN RIGHTS” written across the top in lovely floral icing. Along you come and say, “Give me that cake.”

I say, “No, it’s my cake.”

You say, “Let’s compromise. Give me half.” I respond by asking what I get out of this compromise, and you reply that I get to keep half of my cake.

Okay, we compromise. Let us call this compromise The National Firearms Act of 1934.

There I am with my half of the cake, and you walk back up and say, “Give me that cake.”

I say, “No, it’s my cake.”

You say, “Let’s compromise.” What do I get out of this compromise? Why, I get to keep half of what’s left of the cake I already own.

So, we have your compromise — let us call this one the Gun Control Act of 1968 — and I’m left holding what is now just a quarter of my cake.

And I’m sitting in the corner with my quarter piece of cake, and here you come again. You want my cake. Again.

This time you take several bites — we’ll call this compromise the Clinton Executive Orders — and I’m left with about a tenth of what has always been MY DAMN CAKE and you’ve got nine-tenths of it.

Then we compromised with the Lautenberg Act (nibble, nibble), the HUD/Smith and Wesson agreement (nibble, nibble), the Brady Law (NOM NOM NOM), the School Safety and Law Enforcement Improvement Act (sweet tap-dancing Freyja, my finger!)

I’m left holding crumbs of what was once a large and satisfying cake, and you’re standing there with most of MY CAKE, making anime eyes and whining about being “reasonable”, and wondering “why we won’t compromise”.

I’m done with being reasonable, and I’m done with compromise. Nothing about gun control in this country has ever been “reasonable” nor a genuine “compromise”.

 Posted by at 8:41 am