Dec 102018
 

A seismometer and an air pressure sensor on the InSight lander on Mars have *kinda* picked up the sound of wind n the red planet. These aren’t direct microphone recordings, which I’m honestly surprised wasn’t included in the sensor suite. Additionally, the sounds are just barely audible. It’s unsurprising that Mars isn’t a terribly loud place, since the air pressure there is the same as it is on Earth at about 100,000 feet, more than three times the height of Mt. Everest. Even hurricane speed winds would be weak and quiet at those conditions.

 

 

 Posted by at 6:17 pm
Dec 072018
 

China Launches 1st Mission to Land on the Far Side of the Moon

A Long March 3B has launched the Chang’e 4 probe towards the moon, where if all goes well it will land a stationary base and a rover on the far side of the moon in early January (likely in the Von Kármán Crater). It will communicate with Earth via a comsat placed at the L2 point beyond the moon back in May.

Good luck to ’em. But where are the *fleets* of far side probes that NASA should have launched by now?

 Posted by at 6:06 pm
Dec 072018
 

A NASA model circa 1959 illustrating the general configuration of a nuclear-electric spacecraft for the exploration of Mars. While apparently not meant to represent a serious design proposal, the general configuration is much the same as those created decades later. It features a nuclear reactor at the nose, a long boom with a pair of radiators to get rid of the heat produced by the reactor, and payload at the tail. Payload includes crew areas and an indistinct lander. The ring at the rear is the “propellant accelerator,” which is not described; presumably it is a structural ring holding a bank of ion engines or the like.

Note that the radiators are tapered. This is common in such designs: the gamma ray and neutron shields behind the reactor only block a relatively small portion of the emitted radiation. The radiators fit within that shadowed cone; if the radiators projected out into the unshielded volume, not only could the radiation do some damage to the structural materials it would also heat them up… defeating the whole point of radiators.

This basic layout would still be applicable today, with the main difference being that the engines might well be located elsewhere, firing in a different direction. The reactor could well be at the tail; leaving the engines where they are would turn the long boom into a structure in tension, meaning that the reactor would be “hanging” down. This would be structurally more efficient… after all, the reactor could certainly hang from a string, but a ship could hardly push on a string. Or the engines could be located near the ships center of gravity, firing “sideways.” This would be trickier for the boom, but if the engines are indeed low-thrust ion engines, the forces involved would be almost negligible. Or with a similar arrangement the ship could be made to tumble end over end; with the engines at the CG they could continue to fire “sideways” while the crew enjoyed at least some measure of artificial gravity.

 Posted by at 10:55 am
Dec 052018
 

Well, poop.

After 26 straight successes, SpaceX fails to land Falcon 9 it wanted back

One of the grid fins got stuck, and at a bad angle. This imparted a pretty unfortunate roll, causing the booster to miss the landing pad. In fact, it missed Florida and landed in the Atlantic, not far from shore… crashed down, fell over *then* sank into the swamp. Fortunately the mission itself is, so far, successful, with the Dragon space capsule delivered to the proper orbit. This version of the Dragon will, hopefully, soon be transporting astronauts to the Space Station. Chances are that the booster is trashed, but not *destroyed.* So it will be recovered, analyzed and fixes made.

 Posted by at 5:46 pm
Dec 042018
 

As previously mentioned, I’m tapping away at a CAD model of the Star Raker for the primary purpose of diagrams & art for the next issue of US Launch Vehicle Projects, and the secondary goal of a model kit. The plan at this time is to produce the Star Raker as a 1/288 scale model. That’s a slightly unusual scale; most launch vehicle models are in 1/144 or even 1/72 scale. But the Star Raker… she was huge. It was a horizontal takeoff airbreathing single stage spaceplane designed not to resupply a  space station or any such trivial task, but to deliver to low Earth orbit the raw materials with which to build solar power satellites. it’s payload would have been small by the reckoning of most SPS launchers, which tended to have megapound-class payload capacities, but it still would have rivaled the Saturn V. To do that with a winged vehicle meant that its wings were vast, spanning 375 feet.

Here is a basic render of the model as it currently stand. the overlaid grid shows how big the 1/288 kit will be: each grid is one inch. You would not feel ashamed to have this sit on your desk or bookshelf.

My goal with this model is to have a relative *few* bits of extra details. Cockpit and landing gear would be tiny and pretty much infeasible at this scale, and there were no underslung weapons or gun turret or any such thing. Consequently the part count should be low. The model is being designed for the best simplicity possible in order to keep the price as low as feasible. A model kit is as yet not a sure thing. So if you know anyone who might be interested, let them know.

Something I think might look good, once the USLP project is done, is to continue with the diagramming and go into some detail and produce a large-format print of some kind, either cyanotype or mylar…

 Posted by at 8:16 pm
Dec 042018
 

In the late 1960’s H.H. Koelle of the Technische University Institut Fuer Raumfahrttechnik in Berlin devoted considerable effort to studying a reusable heavy lift launch vehicle. A good, well-illustrated report was put out in 1968 covering the design:

Entwurfskriterien fur groBe wiederverwendbare Tragersysteme (Design Criteria for Large Reusable Space Transportation Systems)

Note that the Neptun was *gigantic.* It was a two-stage ballistically recovered design, unusual in that rather than being circular in cross-section it was hexagonal. The individual propellant tanks were each the size of or bigger than the S-IC first stage of the Saturn V.

 

 

 

A number of payloads were proposed. One was a sub-orbital intercontinental passenger transport, The passenger “capsule” would land separate from the Neptun itself.

One of the more interesting payloads contemplated was a large Orion nuclear pulse vehicle, transported in two pieces (propulsion module in one launch and payload/pulse units in the other). Presumably this would be a NASA Orion hitching a ride on a West German booster; I suspect politics would have negated the likelihood of the West Germans developing a mass production line for nuclear explosives.

 

This fusion-powered interplanetary spacecraft is also a NASA design, dating from the early 1960’s.

Support the APR Patreon to help bring more of this sort of thing to light!

 

patreon-200

 Posted by at 6:29 pm
Dec 032018
 

SpaceX just launched and recovered a Falcon 9 booster for the third time, after previous launches in May and August. Additionally, the upper stage has reached the intended orbit and will begin spitting out its payload of 64 small satellites. Most famous of these is the infamous “Orbital Reflector,” an “art project” designed to annoy astronomers.

Remember when recovering a rocket *once* was big news?

 Posted by at 11:52 am
Dec 032018
 

A magazine ad from 1963 showing the S-IV stage and the X-20 Dyna Soar. The Dyna Soar is shown without its adapter section and Transtage, indicating that it is approaching re-entry (note that it is shown with the canopy heat shield still in place). The Saturn S-IV stage, used on a few Saturn I launches, was smaller than the S-IVB that was used on later Saturn Ib and Saturn V launches, and used six RL-10 rocket engines instead of the S-IVB’s single J-2. Also note the three prominent “ullage rockets” sticking out from the base of the stage. These were small solid rocket motors that would impart a slight forward acceleration to the stage prior to the ignition of the RL-10’s. The acceleration would be high enough and last long enough to settle the propellants into the rears of the tanks. Otherwise the liquid propellants would float around in microgravity and might very well not feed properly into the plumbing system; if a turbopump swallowed a large bubble of gas rather than liquid, it could be destroyed.

The Saturn I/S-IV never launched an actual Apollo CSM, but only boilerplate test articles. Interestingly, the BP-16 test article, launched May 25, 1965, stayed in orbit until July 8, 1989.

 Posted by at 12:43 am
Dec 032018
 

On January 1, the New Horizons probe will pass by the small asteroid 2014 MU69 “Ultima Thule” at a distance of something like 2,200 miles. Given the extremely limited propulsion capabilities of the little probe – just some reaction control thrusters – I remain amazed that in the vastness of space the spacecraft will be able to come that close to an object of interest.

12 years after launch, New Horizons probe zeroes in on mysterious Ultima Thule

 Posted by at 12:12 am