Feb 022019
 

On the 29th, APR Patrons and Monthly Historical Documents program subscribers were sent emails containing links to the January, 2019 rewards. This months set of documents and diagrams included high-rez copies of:

Document: “ASTRO A Manned Reusable Spacecraft Concept,” a Douglas Missiles & Space brochure from August, 1962, describing a two-stage Shuttle-like vehicle

Document: “Status update Ramjet Propulsion 1978” a brochure from the Marquardt Company

Document: “Rocket Blitz Form the Moon” an article from the October 23, 1948 issue of “Colliers” magazine describing the use of the Moon as a missile base, with some helpful Bonestell illustrations of Manhattan getting nuked.

Diagram: A large format color scan of the 1970 North American Rockwell PD-157-17-2 HIPAAS V/STOL jet fighter

CAD Diagram: isometric view, Bernal Sphere space habitat

If this sort of thing is of interest and you’d like to get in on it and make sure you don’t miss any of the forthcoming releases, sign up either for the APR Patreon or the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program.

 

 




 Posted by at 2:21 am
Jan 272019
 

A magazine ad from 1966 depicting a lifting body in space. The design seems reasonable 9sort of a cross between the M2and the HL-10) but could very well be a product not of engineers but of the art department. The angle is not the most informative, but it appears that this design has something of a squared-off nose. Note that the cockpit canopy is exposed, something that very few small lifting body designs had… for the simple reason that the windows would likely melt during re-entry, and that would defeat the purpose in making the thing recoverable. As vehicles get bigger, such as the space shuttle, the windows get further away from the nose and can be made survivable. But little designs like this? not very likely with 1960’s tech. Otherwise, though, it is an attractive illustration.

 Posted by at 5:41 pm
Jan 252019
 

New Horizons’ Newest and Best-Yet View of Ultima Thule

Obtained with the wide-angle Multicolor Visible Imaging Camera (MVIC) component of New Horizons’ Ralph instrument, this image was taken when the KBO was 4,200 miles (6,700 kilometers) from the spacecraft, at 05:26 UT (12:26 a.m. EST) on Jan. 1 – just seven minutes before closest approach. With an original resolution of 440 feet (135 meters) per pixel, the image was stored in the spacecraft’s data memory and transmitted to Earth on Jan. 18-19. Scientists then sharpened the image to enhance fine detail.

 Posted by at 7:30 pm
Jan 242019
 

D’oh.

Additionally, the Blue Origin New Shepard made it officially to space:

 

Bonus: Popular Mechanics interview with Elon Musk where he describes using methane or water transpiration cooling for the Starship stainless steel structure during re-entry.

 

 Posted by at 11:53 am
Jan 242019
 

The idea of “orbital billboards” is not new, but the Russian firm “StartRocket” has a desgn that is perhaps more technically feasible that many prior ideas. An array of cubesats would fly in a grid-pattern formation, with each satellite deploying a solar sail-like unfurlable mirror; by orienting each satellite correctly, the mirror would either reflect light down to Earth or not, making a simple dot matrix display in the sky.

Their video ad:

The more satellites in the grid, the bigger and more complex the text or image could be.

While technically feasible, there would seem to be some substantial challenges. Once again, the feature that makes the system would is a big lightweight “solar sail.” This means that solar photon pressure would be constantly acting on the small cubesats… but more importantly, atmospheric drag would be a serious issue. Since some would be flying oriented 90 degrees off to the others for several minutes at a time, drag would operate on some differently than others; the grid would seem likely to fall apart pretty quickly. Even at the proposed altitude of 500 kilometers, drag would be a recognizable issue. The array would only be able to pull off a handful of messages per day, and each of those for only a few minutes; it would seem likely that the rest of the time would need to be spent in correcting the formation via a dance of solar sails. Which would seem likely to make the array look to ground observers like it was flickering. Whether cubesats would have the ability to keep that up, I don’t know. I suspect that even with the best systems, atmospheric drag and impacts with tiny bits of space junk would soon turn the sails into perforated tatters, as well as dragging the whole system out of the intended orbit.

And then come the nuisance lawsuits…

Major corporations would be well advised to think twice before paying to have their brand plastered across the night sky, as there would be some level of negative blowback. But then people hated billboards, mucking up the roadside views, and yet here we are.

The StartRocket website starts off with a dubious quote from Andy Warhol:

“The most beautiful thing in Tokyo is McDonald’s. The most beautiful thing in Stockholm is McDonald’s. The most beautiful thing in Florence is McDonald’s. Peking and Moscow don’t have anything beautiful yet.”

Uh-huh. Go on and guess what *my* views on Warhol and his crappy “art” are.

Space has to be beautiful. With the best brands our sky will amaze us every night.

No ugly place there after this.

Riiiiiiiiight…..

The website also suggests that the array could be used to display helpful messages in times of natural disaster. But it seems to me more likely that it would be used to display propaganda.

 

 Posted by at 10:05 am
Jan 232019
 

How Trump Offered NASA Unlimited Funding to Go to Mars in His First Term

As usual for modern journalism, the headline isn’t exactly correct. In 2017, Trump rather offhandedly *asked* the NASA administrator if it would be possible to land a man on Mars by the end of his first term if NASA was given unlimited funding.

It’s not a particularly unreasonable sort of question to ask. And it is an interesting question. Ditch the personalities and the politics: if it was determined that We Must Get Our Asses To Mars ASAP, how quickly *could* NASA do it, given all the funding it could use? Obviously, infinite amounts of cash would not be helpful… after a certain point, you’ve got as many experts as you can use, and you’re working them at maximum output.

Additionally, if you expand beyond just NASA, you might end up with a different, better answer. SpaceX, a year or so ago, seemed to think they could get manned-capable rockets to Mars by 2022 or so. Well, maybe. But if they had NASA-level funding… that “maybe” becomes more likely.

And it also speed things along if you are flexible in your goals. Getting a man to Mars is a whole hell of a lot easier than getting a man *back* from Mars. So you could throw a couple guys in a lander-habitat with a truckload of C-rations to Mars a whole lot faster than you could prepare a round trip mission. This sort of thing has been looked at since the early 60’s; Bell Aerospace seriously examined the concept of sending a single man on a one-way mission to the Moon, with continual resupplies and *eventual* recovery by Apollo. This idea was met with a mix of repulsion and denial, but did lead to one of the dullest hard sci-fi movies ever, “Countdown.” And a few decades later it helped inspire the “Mars Direct” concept at Martin-Marietta, and more recently the rather oddly conceived and possibly scamulous “Mars One” project.

 Posted by at 7:35 pm
Jan 222019
 

Around 1963-64 a fair amount of effort went into the concept of a single-launch space station with artificial gravity. These stations would be launched atop a Saturn V and would deploy either toroidal or radial structures for the crew to inhabit. The design below (probably Lockheed) is reasonably representative of the radial-arm configuration. During launch the three arms would fold down “behind” the station core, and would deploy out 90 degrees once in orbit.

 Posted by at 10:08 pm
Jan 192019
 

The aircraft in search of a mission loses its mission:

Stratolaunch abandons launch vehicle program

“Stratolaunch is ending the development of their family of launch vehicles and rocket engine,” the spokesman said in an emailed statement. “We are streamlining operations, focusing on the aircraft and our ability to support a demonstration launch of the Northrop Grumman Pegasus XL air-launch vehicle.”

Yeah… I’m sorry, but developing an over-sized aircraft to launch the under-sized and over-priced Pegasus XL? Not a good business model. This news pretty well confirms that this was a “vanity project” by billionaire Paul Allen. When he died in October, the management of his companies and projects passed into the hands of people more interested in profit than whatever dreams he had. This should be a cautionary tale for the likes of Musk and Bezos… get their own dream projects running, successful, and *profitable* just as soon as they can. Because the moment they are gone… the dream dies.

As there is likely not a museum big enough for the Stratolaunch, I expect it will be broken down for parts before too long.

 Posted by at 10:12 am
Jan 192019
 

Space junk it becoming a bit of a problem. With half a million bits of trash currently being tracked, and far more to come in the near future, low Earth orbit could potentially become a dangerous place to be. There have been lots of plans proposed to deal with space junk, from lasers used to ablate the leading faces of small bits to cause them to deccellerate and deorbit, to satellites that would grab other, dead satellites and drag them down to their firey dooooom. But with hundreds of thousands of bits being tracked, and millions of bits too small to track, something  a bit broader might need to be tried.

As with a lot of environmental cleanup plans, a big issue here is that cleaning up LEO will cost money but not necessarily generate income. But what if it could?

Assume that the SpaceX Starship and Super Heavy come to pass. The Starship is supposed to be able to take a jetliners worth of passengers to Mars… but only a small percent of that number could sit at sizable windows at any one time. So… modify a Starship specifically for short-duration space tourism, with the number of passengers dictated not by mass but by how many could sit at the window all at once. And instead of going to orbit, the Starship simply goes *up.* So, what about the wasted payload potential? Water. Lots and lots of water. As the Starship coasts through space, it sprays out a fine mist of water, creating a cloud of water vapor at the *altitude*of low Earth orbit, but not the *velocity*of low Earth orbit. The cloud would of course follow the ship both up and down, spending a matter of minutes in space. Any small bits hitting the cloud will be substantially slowed, perhaps enough to fall out of orbit almost immediately; larger satellites would of course also be affected, so timing would be important.

This suborbital hop could be straight up, leaving a cylinder of vapor perhaps many hundreds of miles high. The Starship could also launch from, say, California to land in Florida; the maximum altitude  reached would be lower, but the duration in space would be longer. And the return trip from Florida to California would result in much higher impact velocities between space junk and the cloud. North-South flights would put a long “net” across equatorially orbiting bits.

SpaceX has said that they think they can fly the Starship to orbit for something like $10 million. A suborbital hop filled not with rocket fuel but water should be substantially cheaper. If this sort of suborbital hop could fly for $5 million and carry 20 passengers, that means that each passenger could pay $250,000 for both the short bit of suborbital tourism… and get the satisfaction of cleaning up a bit of space.

Further benefits could be had if the water wasn’t purely water, but had some sort of “reflectant” in it. As the cloud came back down, it would hit the upper atmosphere and smear out across it, leaving, for a time, a high altitude cloud that would reflect sunlight back out into space, aiding with that “global warming” thing.

 Posted by at 12:48 am
Jan 182019
 

Yesterday the Trump Administration announced that the US is going to get back into the “Star Wars” business. Not to the scale of the original Strategic Defense Initiative days, when the goal was to put a dent in a Soviet full strike, but to knock down a strike from the likes of Iran or North Korea or Canada.

“Star Wars” Lite? We Explain Trump’s Missile Defense Strategy

A direct link to the Missile Defense Review is HERE. Ideas include F-35’s and drones armed with lasers and/or interceptor missiles to do boost phase interception… which would, of course, require that the aircraft be on-station near the launch site as it happens. This might work for the likes of North Korea or Iran, but wouldn’t be valuable against Russian or Chinese land or sea based ICBMs. For those, they also want to use space based interceptors. Yay! If the US actually goes ahead and fields a flock of Brilliant Pebbles, as was planned late in the SDI days, it will require a *lot* of low-cost launch capability.

It ain’t gonna happen, of course.

 Posted by at 2:23 am