Mar 262019
 

US to Return Astronauts to the Moon by 2024, VP Pence Says

On one hand… good. On the other hand… I’ll believe it when I see it. I’ll *start* to believe in the possibility of it when I see a finalized design for a lunar lander.

The US *should* be able to do this. Whether *NASA* could do this, I have substantial doubts. SpaceX? I would be unsurprised if they could do it, and it would make me happy if the first manned lunar landing of the 21st century happens in 2024 when a USSF-owned and operated SpaceX Starship lands on the lunar surface with ten scientists and ten Space Marines ready to plant the flag and claim territory for the United Federation of Planets of America, complete with had modules, regolith moving equipment, a ten megawatt nuclear reactors and a big-ass Drax Industries “Screw You Mk. 2” laser gun.

 Posted by at 2:39 pm
Mar 192019
 

Artwork of the Boeing Integrated Manned Interplanetary Spacecraft, circa 1968. This is the best known of the numerous manned Mars spacecraft designed over the last half century, and is often directly associated with Werner von Braun as he would go on to try to get congress and NASA to forge ahead with the program. Obviously he was not successful. Aspects of this spacecraft design were illustrated in great detail in US Spacecraft Projects #03 and USSP #04

I’ve seen this piece of art many times over the years, always in pretty poor resolution; I finally found a good-rez version on eBay a while back. I’ve made the full-rez scan available to above-$10-subscribers to the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program/Patreon. Clearly the original painting must have been done in color, but I do not think I’ve ever seen this image reproduced in color. I suspect that about ten seconds after I keel over someone will put on eBay a 24X26 full-color pristine lithograph with a buy-it-now price of five bucks. So keep an eye out for that: you see it, I’m like as not deadern’ disco.

If this sort of thing is of interest, consider subscribing. Even a buck a month will help out; but the more you subscribe for, the more you get… and the more you help me get from eBay and save for the ages.

 

 

 Posted by at 10:05 pm
Mar 172019
 

An idle thought occurred while Netflix was on for background noise while I poked away at the computer.

Can we shoehorn the James Bond and 2001 universes together? Obviously we can’t assume that every Bond movie is canonical with “2001,” since the Bond flicks recognize that the USSR fell. But *one* movie… maybe. Consider the linking figure: actor William Sylvester.

Sylvester played Dr. Heywood Floyd,  head of the National Council of Astronautics, in 1968’s “2001.” He also played “Pentagon Official” in 1967’s “You Only Live Twice.” Obviously these are not the same character, as the timeframes of the movies are separated by ~34 years, while the *actor* was essentially the same age (~45) in both movies. But here’s the what-if: what if that Pentagon Official was Heywood Floyds father? It’s *really* not that unusual for people deeply involved in the government bureaucracy and politics to have kids who follow in their footsteps. Dr. Floyd would have been born when his father was about 34, a perfectly cromulent age for that sort of thing.

It’s a minor point, of course, to have the same actor. But the events of “You Only Live Twice,” where a well-funded terrorist organization is paid by the Chinese to run a space launch facility and program to steal Soviet and American space capsules, might be just the sort of thing to set changes in the timeline in motion. A private organization operating Chinese equipment (it’s unclear whether the entire rocket and spacecraft were Chinese products through and through, or if SPECTRE designed them themselves using Chinese hardware, or what) and proving rapid turnaround for a partially reusable space launch system in 1967 would have been just the thing to get the USA and USSR off their butts. NASA was well on it’s way to the moon, but the “Bird One” spacecraft would have set them on the course to developing low-cost reusable craft *fast.* Because not only would it be obvious that major powers have such craft… so do criminal organizations.

“Pentagon Official” saw World War III nearly break out over a small reusable spacecraft of remarkable capability. Doubtless he would have shared that with his then-11-year-old son. That could well have set Lil’ Heywood on his way, just as the events set the US and the USSR on their way to lunar bases and space stations.

I suppose there might be a longer fan-fiction story in there.

– – –

By the way: a few years ago I mastered kits for Fantastic plastic that fit directly into this hypothesis. Click the pics for the links to ordering them.

 

 

 Posted by at 8:23 pm
Mar 122019
 

The logic behind these claims seem to have been left out of the article:

NASA boss says first person on Mars ‘likely to be a woman’

“The answer is absolutely. In fact, it’s likely to be a woman, the first next person on the Moon,” Bridenstine said. “It’s also true that the first person on Mars is likely to be a woman.”

If there was a practical reason for this, fine. Like if women are substantially better adapted to low/no gravity, or if the astronaut corps was predominantly female, or if they already know who they plan on lobbing at the Moon and Mars because they’ve held the trails and it turned out that the clearly best candidates were women… sure, fine. But as it is, it doesn’t make a lot of sense. This is likely to be either “International Soviet Women’s Day” pandering or signs that NASA is being overrun with SJWs at the highest levels.

The administrator said that “NASA is committed to making sure that we have a broad …  on the Moon.”

 

 Posted by at 7:14 pm
Mar 112019
 

White House is looking to cut back on the SLS.

NASA budget proposal targets SLS

The NASA budget proposal is about half  billion dollars less, but a lot of that would be made up for in going with cheaper options. For instance, by switching from SLS to a commercial launcher (presumably the Falcon 9 Heavy), $700 million would be saved. In this proposed budget most areas of NASA would get some amount of cuts, but an interesting bump up is in “Exploration R&D.” Given that NASA works best as an R&D organization, that’s very likely a good thing.

 

 

Account FY19 Enacted FY20 Proposal Difference
SCIENCE $6,905.7 $6,303.7 -$602.0
– Earth Science $1,931.0 $1,779.8 -$151.2
– Planetary Science $2,758.5 $2,622.1 -$136.4
– Astrophysics $1,496.2 $1,197.4 -$298.8
– Heliophysics $720.0 $704.5 -$15.5
AERONAUTICS $725.0 $666.9 -$58.1
SPACE TECHNOLOGY $926.9 $1,014.3 $87.4
EXPLORATION $5,050.8 $5,021.7 -$29.1
– Orion $1,350.0 $1,266.2 -$83.8
– Space Launch System $2,150.0 $1,775.4 -$374.6
– Exploration Ground Systems $592.8 $400.1 -$192.7
– Exploration R&D $958.0 $1,580.0 $622.0
SPACE OPERATIONS $4,639.1 $4,285.7 -$353.4
STEM ENGAGEMENT $110.0 $0.0 -$110.0
SAFETY, SECURITY AND MISSION SERVICES $2,755.0 $3,084.6 $329.6
CONSTRUCTION & ENVIRONMENTAL $348.2 $600.4 $252.2
INSPECTOR GENERAL $39.3 $41.7 $2.4
TOTAL $21,500.0 $21,019.0 -$481.0
 Posted by at 2:35 pm
Mar 082019
 

The Crew Dragon successfully splashed down and was recovered. To all appearances, this flight was entirely successful, meaning that this summer SpaceX *should* start flying manned capsules to the ISS. Once that happens, the US will be a spacefaring nation once again. About friggen’ time.

There are, however, some people who are a little unhappy about this:

Russian editor: Our space program is entering the “Dark Ages”

Russia’s passive-aggressive reaction to SpaceX may mask a deeper truth

Basically, Russia has been resting on their Soyuz laurels for far too long. Once NASA is no longer paying them $400 million a year to launch a few US astronauts to the ISS, Roscosmos is going to have  hard time affording the launch of their own cosmonauts. And they don’t really have anything in the pipeline to compete with SpaceX, certainly not in the near term.

Also resting on their laurels are other American launch providers… Boeing, Lockheed, ULA. The Delta IV and Atlas V looked *really* outdated compared to Falcon, and the ULA “Vulcan” launcher, which throws away the whole booster except for a propulsion/avionics module which is to be air-snatched prior to splashdown, is a half-hearted joke compared to the Falcon 9’s recoverable boosters.

 

 Posted by at 12:50 pm
Mar 072019
 

A video where some guys get into the archives of the US Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. On display is a sizable (looks like about 1/50 scale) Space Shuttle, ET and Boosters made from plexiglas. It is a thing of beauty, surely a chore and a half for the model shop back in the day. This is *not* the final Shuttle design; some differences are obvious such as the split cargo bay doors and, while unmentioned in the video, the existence of extended OMS pod fairings, reaching out onto the aft of the cargo bay doors.

Last time I visited the USS&RC in something like 2005 they had a much bigger plexiglas STS model on public display, something like 1/10 scale, along with a gigantic plexiglas Saturn V. Such things are fantastic artifacts, and if you are working on a complex engineering project like this a see-through plexiglass large scale model is terribly helpful. I suspect that such things are only rarely made these days, as computer graphics are a lot easier, cheaper and more readily updatable. But nothing beats a Real Thing. And at least so far, 3D printing is not up to the job of stamping out large-scale transparent models like this. But someday…

 Posted by at 12:45 pm
Mar 052019
 

Good as it can be, Star Trek is imperfect. One of the recurring flaws, visible in every series from TOS to ENT, and appearing in fan fiction and horrible fraudulent cash-grabs like STD, is explained succinctly in the video below:

“The Orville” is also imperfect. But as the video below shows, it can be dayum pretty. Unrealistic space battles are nothing new in sci-fi TV; Babylon 5 and Deep Space Nine certainly had their share of memorable ones. But the advances in computer tech, as well s paying-attention-tech, means that this space battle has something a lot of the previous ones didn’t: shiploads of debris. there’s still pew-pew sounds in space, lasers you can see and ships violating Newtonian physics in order to bank and dodge like fighter jets, but it sure does look purty. And that is a win: nobody is watching the Orville for hard sci-fi, but to be entertained.

 Posted by at 3:41 pm
Mar 042019
 

A scale comparison between the Saturn V and Sea Dragon CD models I’m working on for a 1/7o0 scale kit for Fantastic Plastic. The Sea Dragon would have had about four times the payload of the Saturn V, despite being *gigantic* compared to the Saturn V. This was due to the fact that the Sea Dragon was, by design, a *low* performance vehicle, using simple pressure feed. the result was that everything was necessarily gigantic… giant engines, tanks, wall thicknesses, plumbing lines, etc. While the main propellant feed lines for most rockets are measured in inches, up to a foot or two, in diameter, the LOX and RP-1 lines at the base of the Sea Dragon were about ten *feet* in diameter.

 

 

 Posted by at 10:28 pm