Apr 102014
 

Around the time NASA was studying the likes of space colonies and solar power satellites in the 1970’s, it was also commissioning studies of advanced launch vehicles which would be cheaper than the Shuttle (which as yet had not launched nor proven to be as massively expensive as it would turn out to be). One such design was a single stage to orbit vehicle designed by Martin Marietta. Similar to the Shuttle Orbiter in configuration, it was comparatively very fat due to being stuffed full of liquid hydrogen fuel and liquid oxygen. Diagrams have been floating around of this thing and are readily accessed; less rarely seen is color artwork of it.

Shazam:

martin ssto

 Posted by at 5:00 pm
Apr 082014
 

Possible Mars Mission ‘Showstopper’: Vision Risks for Astronauts

Postflight examinations performed on about 300 American astronauts since 1989 showed that 29 percent of space shuttle crewmembers (who flew two-week missions) and 60 percent of International Space Station astronauts (who typically spend five or six months in orbit) experienced a degradation of visual acuity, according to a report published this year by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

The cause of this, perhaps surprisingly, isn’t radiation, but an increase in pressure in the skull. Because rather than being pulled downward out of the skull, blood tends to flow upwards in microgravity.  This would increase pressure on the brain, the eyes and the optic nerves.

Thus: a *proper* space station should have artificial gravity, not enforced 24/7 microgravity for months on end. A 29% chance of having your eyesight degraded might well be more of a turnoff for bajillionaires wanting to visit a space hotel than, say, a 0.5% chance of being blown up by the launch vehicle; therefore a space hotel with various levels (achievable by simply stacking Transhab modules into a long cylinder and “tumbling” it) would be an obvious way to go. Such a facility would allow *direct* measurements and comparisons of effects of various gravity levels. Does this eyesight degradation  issue rise linearly as G’s drop? Does it suddenly pop up at 1/10 G? Does it get better or worse if someone is regularly transitioned from 0 G to 1/6 G and back? These are the sort of things that could be quickly and relatively cheaply tested for.

 Posted by at 5:45 am
Apr 032014
 

XCOR Aerospace Announces Brian Binnie as Newest Test Pilot

What makes this “Huh”-worthy is that Bran Binnie flew SpaceShipOne back in the day. You woulda thought he’d’ve been onboard for SpaceShipTwo, but he’s signed on with XCOR instead.

I have heard *rumors* to the effect that SS2 has been having difficulties with their hybrid rocket motor. Given that XCOR is a rocket engine company, I would imagine their propulsion system does what it’s supposed to.

 Posted by at 6:39 pm
Mar 252014
 

A piece of NASA artwork (actually, probably North American Rockwell) depicting the Apollo 8 CSM separating from the S-IVb stage of the Saturn V with the four panels of the LEM adapter section floating away. Date uncertain.

apollo s-ivb

 Posted by at 10:51 am
Mar 242014
 

Well, there’s this:

US-Russia Quarrel Won’t Delay Tuesday Space Station Launch

But with all the back-and-forth sanctioning, at some point it’s virtually certain that the Russians will at least float the notion of cutting off American astronauts from flying on the Soyuz. This would cut off American access not only to the ISS, but to space as a whole.

You know what? Good.

We are entirely too dependent upon others for our space access. Having the Russians shut us down would for the US to turn to ourselves for space access. We’re almost there as it is… the SpaceX Dragon has made it to the station and back several times unmanned; it shouldn’t be long before it can make it there manned (perhaps December 2015). There’s the Boeing CST-100 capsule, which has undergone some considerable design work and pre-prototype testing. There’s the Orion “Multi Purpose Crew Vehicle” capsule being built by NASA & LockMart, and appropriate for a government effort, is not due out for years (manned flight in 2021, maybe). There’s the Sierra Nevada “Dream Chaser” lifting body spaceplane, an aerodynamic test vehicle of which has been drop-tested; an orbital flight may occur in November 2016.

Within a few years, the US should be able to fly our own astronauts into space again without having to hitch a ride with someone else. But what if by the time we do so, the Russians have changed the locks on the doors of the ISS?

Well… good.

The ISS is a serious disappointment. The crew is too small to do a whole lot more than maintenance; they’re certainly not building Mars-bound spacecraft at the ISS. There’s no rotating section for artificial gravity, something any self respecting space station should have. And it’s freakin’ expensive. Imagine what NASA could achieve *IF* it didn’t have to pay for ISS operations, but kept the same budget *and* had good leadership (fat chance, I know). NASA would do well to wash its hands of the ISS and devote its attention to, say, a partnership with Bigelow to finally get his “space hotel” built. Rather than building its own space station, NASA could simply rent or lease a few modules on the space hotel.

So, Russia, do us a favor. Cut us off.

 Posted by at 4:30 pm