Jun 092009
 

No matter how experimental an aircraft is, if it’s even remotely successful – or if it even looks like it might be successful someday – the company behind it will try to sell it as an operational vehicle. Such was the case with the Bell X-14, which actually was a successful experimental VTOL aircraft. Bell Aircraft proposed several derivative designs for a number of roles, including trainer, anti-ship and ground attack. The latter role was to be supported by the three-engined X-14C.

x-14c_art.jpg

The X-14C would be an all-new vehicle, but based on the systems and layout pioneered by the X-14. As shown by the artwork above, the X-14C would be able to lay something of a beatdown upon ground targets. however, as is common with aerospace promotional artwork, what’s shown is the whole range of stores that the X-14C could carry… just not all at once. Bombs, missiles, rockets,  gun pods, fuel tanks… perhaps even a few cranked up Marines.

More on the X-14C (and other X-14 derivatives) can be found in Aerospace Projects Review issue V1N3.

 Posted by at 8:23 pm
May 162009
 

Before the Lunar Orbit Rendezvous concept came along and produced the LEM, the Apollo Command and Service Modules were going to land directly onto the Moon. Below is a General Dynamics concept for one such lander, dating from October, 1961. This is part of a larger drawing that I’m working on cleaning up.

Once again… I’ll be traveling shortly, so blogging will be reduced for roughly two weeks. CD-ROM orders will be delayed, but download orders should still be filled in relatively short order (assuming WiFi connections are to be had).

lunarlander.jpg

 Posted by at 11:44 pm
May 042009
 

A cutaway painting and sideview of an early/mid 1950’s concept from Bell Aircraft for a VTOL jet fighter, using a single turbojet engine and the “Vertiburner” concept:

d-139-art1.jpg

This design eventually morphed into the D-188 concept which replaced the Vertiburners with discrete liftjets; the D-188 eventually morphed into the D-188A, which has been erroneously labeled the “F-109.”

To see more on this… much more… check out issue V2N3 of Aerospace Projects Review.

 Posted by at 3:15 pm
Apr 272009
 

Works out to 99 pages. I will have it available tomorrow (Tuesday) and will begin sending it out to subscribers.

<> Issue V2N2 was the biggest APR to date… 153 pages, and $10 to download. But remember that a six-issue subscription only costs $28. But once V2N3 is published, you’ll only be able to get V2N2 as a $10 “back issue.” So if you want to subscribe and still get V2N2, subscribe fast!

http://www.up-ship.com/blog/eAPR/index.htm

 Posted by at 10:04 am
Apr 092009
 

rd-1a.jpg
I’ve been working with Justo Miranda to make his Dossiers available online as downloadable PDF files. Things are ready to go… nine of his dossiers are available for purchase right now, with the rest to come along soon (it takes a while to scan & prepare these publications, since I’m shooting for high quality). They are available for purchase via PayPal, and are currently *half* the price of the original paper editions. Soon the whole publication catalog will be available for purchase via Paypal, downloadable directly to your computer.

rd-2a.jpg
Previously difficult to come by, the “Reichdreams Dossiers” cover aspects of the designs of WWII German and Allied advanced aircraft and weapons projects, presenting them with high-quality diagrams, masterpieces of the draftsmans art. All issues are scanned at 300dpi, full-color or grayscale where appropriate, with images cleaned and color corrected for highest quality. Check back regularly – or request to be put on the e-mailing list – for updates.As of April 9, 2009, Dossiers # 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 20 are available.

http://www.up-ship.com/blog/drawndoc/rd/rd.htm

rd-3a.jpg

 Posted by at 12:25 am
Mar 232009
 

Most of the issue is in place, but it’s a jumble, with a good deal of work yet to do. But here you can see roughly what it’ll look like. Biggest article is Part 2 on the Bell BoMi; second biggest is Part 1 on the Bell D-188. Third is a Dennis R. Jenkins article on a three-engined 747 variant. Also included: Fairchild NEPA nuclear-powered bomber; Martin Model 262; Blackburn B-49B; Grumman D-623-2024.
v2n3.jpg

 Posted by at 10:35 am
Mar 092009
 

From the Scotish Sunday Herald:

PLANS TO refurbish Trident nuclear weapons had to be put on hold because US scientists forgot how to manufacture a component of the warhead, a US congressional investigation has revealed.

The US National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) “lost knowledge” of how to make a mysterious but very hazardous material codenamed Fogbank. ….

Neither the NNSA nor the UK Ministry of Defence would say anything about the nature or function of Fogbank. But it is thought by some weapons experts to be a foam used between the fission and fusion stages of a thermonuclear bomb. US officials have said that manufacturing the material requires a solvent cleaning agent which is “extremely flammable” and “explosive”. The process also involves dealing with “toxic materials” hazardous to workers.

I wish I could say this sort of thing was rare, but it’s disturbingly common. I’ve seen it multiple times in my own career. My favorite incident occured one day when I was sitting bored out of my mind in my cubicle at ATK , and the phone rang. It was someone from elsewhere on the plant; they were having a problem with a coating for some igniter components for a rocket program that ATK inherited from United Tech, when United Tech went under in 2004. The instructions to make the coating came with the rocket, but no matter what they did, the techs couldn’t actually make the stuff. By this point, United Tech near San Jose had been abandoned, and the buildings bulldozed. There was nobody there to ask anymore. But someone found that I had worked there, so they called me up in hopes that I might have been in touch with a former co-worker who knew something, *anything,* about this particular program. When they explained the coating issue to me, they had to wait a minute or so for me to stop laughing.

As it happens, *I* was the one who had cooked up that coating at Untied Tech. I was one of two guys working this issue there; it was the other fellers program, I was providing assistance. Shortly after we got the coating to work, he left United Tech. And apparently he left before all the paperwork could be updated. So the techs at ATK knew what most (but not all) of the ingredients for the coating were, but not the manufacturing process. And there were a grand total of two people on the entire friggen’ planet who could tell them how to fix it. And through sheer dumb luck, they managed to find one of them right off the bat. But if I hadn’t worked there, or if nobody had thought to call me, Odin only knows how many taxpayer-funded manhours would have been blown trying to figure out how to make a coating that this other feller and I whipped up in about 15 minutes.

Heh.

Good luck with “Fogbank.”

So I publish APR and sell aerospace documents, in no small part to help make sure that not all this knowledge is lost.

 Posted by at 4:56 pm