Mar 012017
 

If you’ve been wondering how the party of fear-mongering and authoritarianism was going to respond to the idea of private American companies going to  space and the moon, I believe we have us an early test balloon:

Congressional candidate: Moon-colonizing companies could destroy cities by dropping rocks

One “Brianna Wu” scientifically embarrasses herself, but likely improves her standing with the Luddites, by claiming that “Rocks dropped from there have power of 100s of nuclear bombs.”

Now, on one hand this is true. If you fling a big enough rock from the surface of the moon, it could hit the Earth with kinetic energy similar to the total energy of a nuke. But there’s the thing: in order to do that, you need to *impart* damn near a nukes worth of kinetic energy in the first place. Simply chucking a rock  from the lunar surface at lunar escape velocity (about 2.4 km/sec) will not put that rock on a trajectory to the Earths surface, but rather just in a very wide  orbit , basically the same orbit the moon has. You’d need to cancel out the orbital velocity, another kilometer or so per second. From there the rock would “fall” to Earth, picking up speed and smacking down with no more than Earth escape velocity, or no more than 11.2 km/sec. So, by accelerating a rock to about 3.5 km/sec, you get it to hit the Earth at about 11 km/sec.

Sounds great for a weapons system. At 11 km/sec, the kinetic energy of one kilogram of rock (or anything) is 60.5 megajoules. One single kiloton of yield is defined as 4.184 terajoules. So to get a kiloton of bang out of a lunar rock, you’d need to launch (4.184 terajoules/60.5 megajoules) 69,157 kilos of rock. Lobbing a seventy-metric ton rock to 3.5 kilometers per second is a non-trivial act. Plus, you have to assure that the rock not only hits the target via accurate guidance, but survives passage through the atmosphere.

But Wu didn’t just say that a rock would have the power of a nuke, but “hundreds” of them. So… let’s say 100 times Fat Man, or 1.5 megatons. That would require the launch not of 70 metric tones, but 105,000 metric tons. The USS Nimitz displaces about 100,000 metric tons. So according to Ms. Wu, the threat posed by the likes of Elon Musk is that he will toss aircraft carriers off the surface of the moon.

Ms. Wu then went on to claim that any criticism of her rather unrealistic fearmongering was due to sexism, and to then decry the militarization of space. Because apparently a few tourists going around the moon will be able to grab chunks of moonrock the size of a carrier battle group and hurl it at Earth.

Silly as her fears are, I won;t be the least bit surprised if they gain traction, and this is used as the basis of an attempt to shut down private spaceflight in the US… or at least to nationalize it “for the children.”

Thanks to blog reader SE Jones for heads-up on this miserable little story.

As always, feel free to check my math.

 Posted by at 7:43 pm
Feb 012017
 

One of the bigger local news stories here in Utah right now is an inversion squatting over the Salt Lake valley, turning the air quality into garbage. Worst air in the USA just now, in fact.

One of the reasons for this is the Wasatch Mountains (i.e. the walls of Mordor) that create a north-south barrier on the eastern side of Salt Lake City. It takes a good storm to blow the air in SLC up and over the mountains. In effect, climate and topography have teamed up to make things bad for humans. So since nature has gone to war against Mankind, we should fight back.

A simple solution would seem to present itself: the thousands of feet of damn-near vertical walls backing up SLC should be breached. Done properly, this would create an outlet for the air, like poking a hole in a dam. And what better way is there than nuclear explosives?

The last American nuclear detonation was way, waaaaaaay back in 1992. There are some blog readers who were surely born well after that (thanks for making me feel old, once again). There are people who were born after that who have achieved advanced degrees in nuclear engineering. Imagine it: a degree in something that hasn’t occurred in your lifetime, and it’s not a history degree.

So, an operation to nuke a hole in the Wasatch range would be useful on many levels. This is not something that could or should be slapped together overnight, but perhaps a five or ten year program. A great deal of study to determine how many nukes where to create what sort of breach. An operation to develop all-new nukes for civil engineering, with a series of tests in the Nevada test range. And then the actual operation to blast a channel through the mountains. I would tentatively suggest a hundred or so detonations along the current route of I-80 to lower the level and broaden it, and a similar series paralleling that, perhaps ten to twenty miles north and another to the south. The eminent domain issues would be pretty substantial, but Utah could, I think, generate the funds needed by the simple expedient of charging property taxes on Utah land currently controlled by the Federal government (the feds control 34.2 million acres of Utah… charge ’em a nominal $500 per acre per year, that’d be a nice $17.1 billion per year).

The detonations themselves would be most likely a slow process. Starting way off in the relatively unpopulated east and marching west, one blast at a time, with each westward blast adjusted based on the current state of things. The last blasts would have to be carefully calibrated and placed so that the mountains slide down to the east, rather than falling west into the cities… that would of course be non-optimal. There would be a vast amount of dirt and rock that would need to be hauled away, a process liable to take several years. An obvious place to put this slightly radioactive rubble would be in Bingham Canyon… humans dug a giant hole in the ground to pull out copper and other metals; what better for it afterwards than to fill it back up?

The new wind-channels carved through the mountains would not only let the crappy air flow out, but would also funnel winds though, making them good locations for wind turbines for power generation. And when the wind stops, you could feed power into the windmills from the terawatt-class nuclear powerplants floating in the re-worked Great Salt Lake to turn them into blowers to suck the air through

 

 Posted by at 2:34 am
Jan 312017
 

… otherwise they might be working on nuclear weapons systems.

Iran tests ballistic missile in defiance of UN resolution, US officials say

The Khorramshahr medium range ballistic missile seems to be on the scale of the Scud.  Hard data on it seems hard to find, but it looks likely to be scaled such as to reach Israel with a single small nuclear warhead.

 

 Posted by at 12:08 pm
Jan 272017
 

The SDASM Flickr account has uploaded some interesting photos of a nuclear detonation. What makes it interesting: the nuclear detonation was in space. Click the small pics below to go to the SDASM Flickr page for better rez versions.

 

   

Vaguely relevant:

Doomsday Clock ticks 30 seconds closer to midnight, thanks to Trump

While the world is certainly a goofier place than it has been in a while, the idea that we’re closer to DOOOOOOM now than during the Cuban Missile Crisis strikes me as ridiculous.

 

 Posted by at 1:05 am
Jan 232017
 

Here’s an interesting illustration of the Polaris sea launched ballistic missile, taken from a technical manual. I’ve uploaded the full-rez version to the APR Patreon Extras Dropbox folder for 2017-01, so if you are interested, consider signing up for the APR Patreon.

POLARIS

 Posted by at 2:02 am
Jan 192017
 

Is your main problem that you are just too cheerful? Is an overwhelming sense of optimism ruining your worldview? Well, boy howdy do I have the cure for you!

Back when I was a kid in the 80’s, it seems to my dim and rusty memory that the airwaves were *filled* with doom-and-gloom. Initially we were all going to die in nuclear fire, but soon enough AIDS was also going to do us in (I have particularly strong vague memories of people freaking the hell out when rumors began to spread that skeeters could spread AIDS). And then there was the crack cocaine and crime in general. It’s kind of a wonder than *any* Gen X’er ever managed to intentionally reproduce.

All y’all too young to remember the 80’s can’t really grasp just how shocking it was when the wall came down and the Soviet Union fell away *without* the world going up in nuclear fire.

 

 

 Posted by at 5:11 pm
Jan 112017
 

“By Dawn’s Early Light” was a made-for-HBO movie filmed and set just before the fall of the Soviet Union. In short, some PO’ed Soviet military jerks steal a Russian nuclear missile, sneak it into Turkey and launch it into Ukraine, sparking a limited nuclear war between Russia and NATO. Due to misunderstandings, mistakes, arrogance and bad leadership, a situation that’s already bad gets worse. While some of the effects are clearly dated, it remains an effectively creepy movie.

One scene that always freaks me right the hell out: the carrier (USS Midway) getting torpedoed and sinking. You don’t see it; it’s just radio messages. This shows an effective example of “less is more.” As there’s no chance that an HBO TV movie budget in 1990 would have been able to show the sinking of an aircraft carrier well, doing it off screen was the right choice.

Cities get nuked. Airplanes brought down. Presidents blinded. There is no happy ending. But at least James Earl Jones gets a real cigarette.

 

 Posted by at 3:16 am
Jan 092017
 

And because why not, here’s “Damnation Alley” from 1977. That year 20th Century Fox had two sci-fi movies for release. “Damnation Alley,” a post-apocalyptic yarn about some schmoes trying to cross the continent to reach safety after a major nuclear war had somehow knocked Earth off its axis, was expected to be the big moneymaker. The other one?  A little film that Fox apparently had much less faith in. Something called “Star Wars.”

While “Damnation Alley” is justly forgotten these days, the Landmaster remains one of the most entertainingly badass vehicles ever built for the screen.

 Posted by at 8:57 am
Jan 032017
 

This YouTube channel is not a producer of content, but an aggregator of vintage documentaries. Additionally, the videos have improved audio and stabilized video – i.e., they’re better to watch and listen to than the originals. The videos are *all* over the place… you’re as likely to see one on nuclear bomb testing as you are on household cleansers. But there are a *lot* of videos that should be of considerable interest to readers of this blog. Lots of military and NASA vids.

Jeff Quitney

Here the page is broken down into convenient playlists.

Some recent videos of interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 Posted by at 9:44 am
Dec 292016
 

I’d posted this YouTube video a few years ago, but I’ve found that not only was the video yanked, the whole account associated with it was nuked. Hmmmph.

A film about NERVA (Nuclear Energy for Rocket Vehicle Applications), 1968.

Provides a basic description of nuclear rockets, plus some art, animation and diagrams of nuclear propelled space vehicles along with footage of test firings.

 

 

 Posted by at 2:24 am