admin

Apr 082017
 

In general I’m opposed to remaking movies that were done right the first time. And most of the time remakes stink. But every now and then a remake comes along that is at least OK. One such was “Flight of the Phoenix.” The original didn’t need to be remade. A lot of people don’t like the 2004 remake, but I think it’s reasonably good. But there was one scene that pushed it past the finish line for me. Our Heroes have crashed in the Gobi desert, far from rescue and essentially doomed unless they can get themselves out. Fortunately, they have among them Elliot (Giovanni Ribisi), an aerospace engineer who knows how to turn their wrecked twin-engined C-119 into a functional single engine aircraft. Problem: they’ve just tangled with armed local nomads who have a demonstrated history of shooting at them and stealing their stuff. So after a brief gun battle, some of Our Heroes stagger back to camp dragging an injured enemy with them.What does a group with extremely limited supplies in an extreme environment do with a captured and grievously injured enemy combatant? It looks like we’re in or a lot of arguing and perhaps even fighting among Our Heroes… until Elliot steps in.

Elliot is a good engineer, but is slightly lacking in tact. But under the circumstances… tact is a minor concern. He is depicted as either an Aspie or a sociopath; my vote would go for Aspie. In either event, he quickly does the math, draws the logical conclusion and performs the needed tasks. It was a thing of beauty. Few have been the times I laughed that loud in a theater.

 Posted by at 9:55 pm
Apr 082017
 

Anybody else ever notice how common headlines like this are? “He was an activist for X, and it turns out he was actually…”

He lobbied for gay rights and opposed Trump — now Seattle’s mayor is accused of sexually assaulting minors


And because why not, the world ain’t half weird enough:

It’s now illegal in Russia to share an image of Putin as a gay clown


And on the subject of Russia… if you still have a LiveJournal account, it’s time to close it out. LJ was sold to the Russians years ago and in December the servers moved to Russia; you are now subject to Russias laws regarding censorship and control over the internet. You are not allowed to post political discussions without first getting LJ’s approval (i.e. the Russian government), and if you have more than 3,000 views per day you’re supposed to register as a media outlet.

Russian-Owned LiveJournal Bans Political Talk, Adds Risk of Spying

 

 Posted by at 9:22 pm
Apr 072017
 

“Generation Tech” is the YouTube channel of the very best kind of nerd: the kind who over-analyzes Star Wars and tries to apply logic and rationality to it. Some people think it’s silly to try to make popular science fiction or fantasy franchises such as Star Wars, Star Trek, Lord of the Rings or the last eight years of the White House make sense, but I find it to be a good way to exercise the brain. With Star Wars, things are complicated by decades of officially licensed novels and comic books and the like that are now officially considered non-canonical, but which still slip into the new canon (witness Grand Admiral Thrawn now being wholly canonical).

Still, some interesting conclusions can be drawn by taking some widely separated, and almost certainly unrelated, hints (hints that were never meant to be linked together by the various authors) and drag them kicking and screaming into some sort of grand unified nerd theory. For example, several details hint at the idea that Emperor Palpatine wasn’t just a simple one-dimensional Bad Guy. Instead… early on in his career he had visions of the galaxy being invaded by an extremely dangerous foe, one that the hidebound Galactic Republic would have been utterly incapable of fighting off. So his obsession with building up a remarkably pointless military (honestly, who was the Imperial navy, with those tens of thousands of star Destroyers supposed to fight?) wasn’t just a pointless obsession, but was a buildup to prepare the galaxy for incoming foes. The Death Stars turn out in this scenario to not be one-off weapons of internal suppression (though that’s what most of the people involved with them thought them to be), but basically the first of a new class of really big battleship to fight off the incoming world-sized enemy ships. There are rumors that this scenario just might ply out in the future Star Wars flicks, presumably the Episodes 10-12 trilogy.

And then there’s the question of “how does a regular schmoe take on a Jedi?” And the answer is the same that I thought up decades ago: shotguns.

Let’s face it: there are few enough situations where “shotgun” is the wrong answer. But against some self-important magical jackass with a laser sword, a shotgun would be extra-handy. Sure, they can use their Force-powers to accurately place their blades to reflect an incoming blaster bolt, which will bounce right off. But what happens to a chunk of lead, copper, steel, or depleted uranium flying at a Jedis face if said Jedi intercepts it with a light saber? He *might* vaporize the projectile. And I’m not sure than an ounce of uranium *vapor* heading at his face it going to be a whole lot safer for him. Not mentioned in the video: grenade launchers. Shoot projectiles at the Jedi that are designed to explode when struck with a light saber… and at no other time. Maybe he can hurl them back at you with the Force, but big whoop. If they go *kerblam* if he uses his blade on them, then he’s got a grenade going off at arms length.

 Posted by at 1:43 pm
Apr 072017
 

TRAPPIST-1’s Fatal Flaw Could Ruin Our Hopes of Finding Life There

Short form: 80 straight days of close examination of the red dwarf star TRAPPIST-1 showed 42 sizable solar flare events. Solar flares on a red dwarf are generally *relatively* more spectacular than they are on a larger star like the Sun… and the planets are far, far closer. The end result is that the X-ray flash from the flares can fry the planetary surfaces and strip their atmospheres.

So the chances of Earth-like conditions just took a bit of a tumble. On the other hand, these sort of flares probably wouldn’t mean much to a Europa-like world… colder than Earth, a deep planetary ocean frozen over on the surface but with kilometers of water underneath. How such a world might exist in a system like this is a bit of a head-scratcher, though. Europa keeps its ocean liquid due to tidal forcing from orbiting Jupiter; the planets of TRAPPIST-1 orbit far further from their star, and the tidal forces would be substantially lower.

 Posted by at 11:33 am
Apr 072017
 

CNN keeps yapping some non-story about “blah blah blah cruise missiles blah blah blah…”

I’m sure it’s fine. Everything is fine.

 

Meanwhile…

Discovery! Atmosphere Spotted on Nearly Earth-Size Exoplanet in First

The planet Gliese 1132 b is “only” 39 light years away, has a radius of 1.4 Earth and a mass of 1.6 Earths (surface gravity should be about  82% of Earths). Sounds great, right? Small problem: it’s real close to its red dwarf star. Orbits once every 1.6 days and gets 19 times the solar radiation as Earth, so it’s less a clone of Earth than a clone of Venus. But it seems to actually be a steamy Venus as astronomers detected water vapor and methane in the atmosphere. So… maybe the old ideas about Venus being a swamp planet loaded with dinosaurs and such might be kinda right… just off by 39 lightyears.

 Posted by at 4:13 am
Apr 062017
 

A few days ago I watched the movie “The Discovery.” It was based on an interesting idea… a scientist played by Robert Redford has scientifically proven to everyones satisfaction that there is, in fact, an afterlife (it’s pretty vague on just how this proof was demonstrated). What the proof does *not* include is any sort of definition on what that afterlife entails… heaven, hell, reincarnation, limbo… nada. Even so, in the several years since the discovery was announced, a major problem has hit society: millions of suicides. Now that people no longer have a doubt about an afterlife, a whole lot of ’em just decide to check out.

Unfortunately, “The Discovery” commits the worst cinematic sin: it was dull.

Still, it’s an interesting idea. How would society respond to proof that there was an afterlife? Three options seem most interesting to me:

A: The afterlife remains an unknown. That’s just it!  We don’t know! Maaaaybe something bad… maaaaybe something good!  I guess we’ll never know!

B: Everybody goes to Hell. Yog Sothoth awaits us all.

C: Everybody goes to Heaven.

What would happen in society at large with each?

With B, I can expect to see near-universal panic. There would be some people who wouldn’t panic… the people who were *already* convinced they were going to Hell. A lot of these people would be nightmares… together with the people who were only holding back their darker impulses because of the fear of Hell, they would rip and tear their way through society, now that they know that it doesn’t matter what they do – or don’t do. As for everybody else, there would be those who’d just sorta try to ignore it. There’d be those who would devote their efforts to life extension… suddenly, attempts to create immortality, or at least practical cryogenic suspension, wouldn’t seem so crackpot.

With C, some things would be the same as B. People restrained in their actions by a fear of damnation, if they knew that no matter how bad they were they still get to go to heaven, would suddenly go bonkers. But where in B most people would try to avoid death at all costs, if it was universally acknowledged that the afterlife is better than this life, it seems to me the population would plummet rather precipitously rather quickly. If life sucks *even* *a* *little,* then the promise of an assured paradise is impossible to ignore.

But Option A is one I can’t really predict. I think most people believe in an afterlife *now,* but there is enough doubt about whether it’s real, and worry about negative afterlives, that it keeps the believers from offing themselves. Additionally, most religions have proscriptions against suicide; if I understand Christianity correctly, suicide is generally a direct pipeline to damnation. Of course, some other, crappier religions offer up the idea that committing suicide while blowing yourself to smithereens is a direct pipeline to paradise; and the results are that regions under control of such religions are generally pretty awful.

Personally, I highly doubt that  scientific proof of an afterlife will come down the line anytime soon. Partially because I can’t see how such a proof could be accomplished; mostly because I doubt the existence of an afterlife. But it’s interesting to consider.

 Posted by at 3:30 am
Apr 042017
 

World’s First Skyscraper Designed To Hang Suspended From An Asteroid

What? No. Just… no.

Sigh. OK, here’s the short form: park an asteroid in Earth orbit, start unreeling a tether from it towards Earth. OK, fine so far… standard Space elevator stuff. But keep building it down until the bottom of the tether is in the atmosphere… and then hang a skyscraper from it.

Errrrmmmm… no.

For starters: materials science. The best stuff we can envision, graphene, *might* be just capable of making a tether that can support its own weight when hung from geostationary. With luck, we could get an elevator car to run up and down on it. But you know what weighs more than an elevator car? An entire friggen’ building.

Second: since the skyscraper is suspended from the cable above the ground, it’s free to wave about in the breeze. But that’s small taters, since the asteroid is not in a standard geostationary orbit, fixed over one spot over the equator. instead it’s on a 24-hour orbit, but highly inclined. Thus at one point in the day it’ll go as far north as New York City, and of course 12 hours later it’ll be just as far south of the equator. But you know what that means? it’s not just sedately wandering, it’s tear-assing across the sky like a jetliner. i can’t be bothered to figure out how fast it’ll be going when it crosses the equator, which is when it’ll be at its fastest, but I suspect it’ll be pushing Mach 1, And buildings kinda suck at that. It hangs down low enough that you have to design it so it doesn’t hit the terrain, so that means it’s a fantastic obstacle for jetliners. I further suspect that a cable 50,000 kilometers long won’t just stay pointed straight down, but might sway just a tad.

 

 

So, is this a serious proposal? It can’t possibly be. It’s a Neat Idea, safely sci-fi; a way for the design firm behind it to get some press. And press they got, unskeptical slobbery press akin to what Solar Roadways and Self Filling Water Bottles and Barack Obama got. I’ve got no problem with the designers… they label it as “speculative” and should take that to Hollywood and make some scratch. But the press needs to be smacked around some. At least some outlets bothered to contact someone who could tell ’em some debunkery.

One other notable flaw in the concept: the idea seem to be to build the major sections of the skyscraper *as* actual terrestrial skyscrapers, reaching kilometers into the sky. Then, they are attached to the bottom of the tether and hauled up. this may sound good… but it ain’t. The skyscrapers during construction would be, like every other tall building, under considerable *compression.* But when you grab ’em by the top floors and lift them up into the sky, they’re no longer in compression, but tension. These are essentially contradictory environments. Concrete is great from compressive loads; it sucks for tension. Graphene cables are great for tension; they’re no use at all in compression. These building would need to be built to handle *both,* and that’s the sort of requirement that makes engineers who are also trying to save weight – because, you know, they’re suspending this thing from 50,000 kilometers of bleeding-edge string – throw their hands up in disgust and decide to take up growing pot for a living.

 Posted by at 10:50 pm
Apr 042017
 

I have no idea if there is a popular movement afoot in Hungary and Poland to leave the EU, but the EU just made it more likely that there soon will be.

Take in migrants or leave, EU tells Hungary and Poland

Gee whiz, take in an invading army of antagonists, or no longer be saddled with an unaccountable bureaucracy. hmm. That’s sure a toughie.

 Posted by at 10:10 pm
Apr 042017
 

Been a busy day, news-wise. First up… a *potential* “ooopsie” for the former Administration:

Rice at center of intelligence storm over ‘unmasking’ flap

Seems that Susan Rice, national security advisor under Obama (and probably best known as the Voice Of The President when it came to blaming terrorism in the middle east not on middle eastern terrorism, but on a badly made video) *may* have had a hand in getting intelligence data on Trump campaign officials.


And in Syria…

Chemical attack kills dozens in Syria as victims foam at the mouth, activists say

Looks like Putins lil’ buddy Assad committed yet another war crime by gassing his own people.


Butwaittheresmore!

North Korea fires a ballistic missile as Trump prepares to host China’s Xi

I’m getting more and more used to the idea that Lil’ Kim is going to actually shoot a nuke at somebody in the foreseeable future.


And finally, by far the biggest news story of the day:

‘Invader Zim’ is returning to Nickelodeon as a TV movie

About time!

As a bonus, it seems all the important voice actors *and* Jhonen Vasquez, creator of Zim, will return.

If you haven’t seen “Invader Zim…” what the hell’s wrong with you? That show was friggen’ awesome, and like Ren & Stimpy before it, I was always amazed that it was put on a kid’s channel. Zim and Futurama are the pinnacle of sci-fi humor animation.

 

 Posted by at 9:10 pm