News has broken that the White House briefly considered doing the blatantly obvious: sending the massive flood of refugees and migrants to cities that *want* massive numbers of illegal immigrants. Watching CNN, all the talking heads are yammering on about how horrible this is, how it’s an idea unworthy of the Presidency, blah, blah, blah. But if the US *has* to house these people, WHY NOT put them into sanctuary cities? Honestly, where better to put them?
There are regions that do not want hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals taking up resources, and then there are sanctuary cities, typically rich regions with electorates and politicians who think mass immigration is just awesome. How can it be that “sanctuary cities” and “massive influx of resource-free immigrants” isn;t a match made in Progressive Heaven?