May 172014
 

I had planned on setting out Sunday morning on the nuclear expedition (see HERE if you don’t know what I mean), but after dropping off the cats at the vet to be boarded… screw it, had nothing better to do today. And it’s just as well I did; it was a long day and I’m still far from Albuquerque. It’s also turning out to be spendier than I’d hoped… apparently there’s some sort of ATV  thing going on in Moab, and that has sucked up every motel room within a Tsar bomb blast radius. Being completely wiped out, I took the first motel room I could get, which was about $60 more than I’d hoped. Bah.

That said, if you haven’t been to southern Utah, cancel your travel plans to Tuscany or France or New York City, and visit *this* place. It’s fricken’ awesome. Pity I don’t have more time to stop and look at the scenery, but nukes await.

One bad thing: the cel reception out here is *bad.* Even in my motel room, I can’t even successfully send out texts or receive phone calls. Huh.

 

 Posted by at 8:58 pm
May 142014
 

And really soon, too… next week. No point in waiting, I suppose.

As previously mentioned, I’m putting together a book titled something like “A Guide to American Nuclear Explosive Devices.” It will include accurate diagrams of American nuclear bombs, RVs and warheads, along with pertinent information for each design. I’ve made a pretty good dent in the basic layout drawings, but there is more research to be done.

In order to get this done, there are a few places I need to visit. One of them is the National Museum of Nuclear Science & Industry in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It’s about an 11 hour drive from here, so  it’d be the better part of a work week to get down there, photograph *everything* (with scale references) and then get back. With gas, motels, cat boarding and the like, it’d be a fair chunk of change, but it also seems a pretty invaluable resource.

Sort of along the way is the Bradbury Science Museum in Los Alamos. A smaller museum, but it looks pretty good as far as nukes. I am also interested in any suggestions for things to see – nuclear, military, aerospace, geological – between Thatcher, Utah, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.

So,  in order to pull this off, I’m looking for funding. In the grand tradition of Kickstarter and the like, I’m using three funding levels:

$10 “Warm Glow”: You get a thank you email and a warm sense of accomplishment.

$50 “Going Ballistic”: I send you a DVD (or 2, or 3, or everything transferred via Dropbox or some such) with every single nuke-relevant photo I take on the trip.

$100 “BLAMMO”: You get the DVD & a prototype edition version of the book, which won’t be otherwise available (I’m looking at 11X17 with old-school pressboard covers, like the BoMi, Dyna Soar & BWB booklets I recently made briefly available). The final book, whether self-published by me or – who knows – by an actual publisher, will almost certainly be formatted much smaller.

So if you want a whole bunch of photos of nuclear weapons and a book of large-format detailed and accurate drawings of American nuclear weapons, or if you just want to help out… now’s your chance. This opportunity will be open for the next week or so.

 

—-
Here is a somewhat older image, showing a number of the nuclear weapons I’ve drawn up (more since then):

nukes3

And here are some images showing roughly what you’ll see in the 11X17 prototype of the book: multiple views of each device in large scale, with a crude mockup of what the data page will look like for each device. It will have unique charts showing the physical effects – overpressure, thermal radiation, cratering, etc. – for each device.

Nuclear warheads nukes-Model

 Posted by at 6:21 pm
May 102014
 

As previously mentioned, I’d like to put together a book titled something like “A Guide to American Nuclear Explosive Devices.” It would include accurate diagrams of American nuclear bombs, RVs and warheads, along with pertinent information for each design. I’ve made a pretty good dent in the basic layout drawings, but there is more research to be done.

In order to get this done, there are a few places I need to visit. One of them is the National Museum of Nuclear Science & Industry in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It’s about an 11 hour drive from here, so  it’d be the better part of a work week to get down there, photograph *everything* (with scale references) and then get back. With gas, motels, cat boarding and the like, it’d be a fair chunk of change, but it also seems a pretty invaluable resource.

Sort of along the way is the Bradbury Science Museum in Los Alamos. A smaller museum, but it looks pretty good as far as nukes.

So, how about this: in order to pull this off, I’m looking for funding. RIGHT NOW THIS IS JUST THEORETICAL… don’t send money unless you really, really want to, or just for giggles, or you think your money would be better off with me than with you, whatever. So in the grand tradition of Kickstarter and the like, I’m thinking of three funding levels:

$10: You get a thank you email and a warm sense of accomplishment.

$50: I send you a DVD (or 2, or 3, or everything transferred via Dropbox or some such) with every single nuke-relevant photo I take on the trip.

$100: You get the DVD & a prototype edition version of the book, which won’t be otherwise available (I’m looking at 11X17 with old-school pressboard covers, like the BoMi, Dyna Soar & BWB booklets I recently made briefly available). The final book, whether self-published by me or – who knows – by an actual publisher, will almost certainly be formatted much smaller.

So… does this sound of interest? If I decide to pull the trigger on this, who would be willing to buy in? If interested at the $50 or $100 level, let me know either via commenting below, or by email.

If this happens, I’d like it to happen soon. Right now Utah can’t decide if it wants winter to be over… but soon enough, it will make that decision, and the nightmarish hellscape of a furnace that is the Utah/New Mexico summer will burst forth.

Shown below is an older version of the set of nukes I’ve drawn up. The final illustrations will generally have more than one view per bomb; three views should be standard, with cutaways where possible.

nukes3

 

 

 Posted by at 9:54 pm
May 092014
 

“Pershing Joins the Ranks”

Note that at 1:09, a Pershing missile is dropped from the bomb bay of a B-52 and the motor fired. I was previously unaware of this test. Anybody know anything about it? It seems odd that a USAF bomber would be used to test a US Army missile.

If it worked as well as it seemed to, I have to wonder what, if any, consideration was given to arming USAF aircraft with Pershing missiles. Not a concept  can recall hearing of before.

b-52-pershing It

 

 Posted by at 10:43 am
May 072014
 

A mid-1960’s concept from General Electric showing a Manned orbital Laboratory-type space lab with two docked Gemini capsules and one nuclear reactor for power. Derived from the SNAP-10a system, this powerplant featured a small reactor at the apex of the cone; the cone itself is the radiator for the system. The SNAP-10a was not a spectacularly efficient system… it produced around 30 kilowatts of thermal energy, of which only 500 were converted to electricity. The system shown below would have been a larger, more powerful and hopefully more efficient system.

The small compact and busy-looking item on the far left of the image would have been the reactor itself. Between that and the structural truss work connected to the large radiator was a thick radiation shield, composed of something like tungsten. Even with this massive chunk in the way, the reactor was still segregated far away from the crew.

ge nuke space station

 Posted by at 11:33 am
May 032014
 

Much of the Strategic Defense Initiative, begun three decades ago, remains murky at best. One little-reported area of study was the launch infrastructure that would be needed to put the vast array of stuff into orbit. Apart from the Delta Clipper, you’d be forgiven for thinking that space launch was nearly forgotten.

However, some study was put into it, as the page below from a 1988 government report shows. Read through it: the SDI needs for space launch would have been *vast.* The total amount of payload delivered to orbit would have ranged from, at the low end, one million kilograms, up to 80 million for the long-range forecast systems.

sdi launch

 

 Posted by at 12:33 pm
May 022014
 

Because Nobody Demanded It, here is a to-scale representation of the DC-1 SSTO with the MOL, the Zenith Star laser testbed and the operational SBL.

mol-zs-dc1-2 mol-zs-dc1-1

This is, of course, in support of my proposed book on the Strategic Defense Initiative. It would include:

Launch systems: Delta Clipper; Millenium Express; Platypus; Zenith Star Launch System; Barbarian; Shuttle-C; NASP

Space-Based weapons: Zenith Star; operational Space Based Laser; Neutral Particle Beam; Saggitar Railgun; X-Ray Laser; Brilliant Pebbles; Space Cruiser

Terrestrial systems: F-15-ASAT; HEDI; ERINT; land-mobile MX; air-mobile MX; Midgetman/HML; Airborne Laser

I *know* I’ve missed a few. Feel free to fill in the blanks.

 Posted by at 3:22 pm
Apr 262014
 

If you’re gonna do it, overdo it. For example, here’s what an operational anti-missile Space Based Laser might’ve looked like, compared to the Zenith Star experimental laser and the Manned Orbiting Laboratory. Kinda bignormous, with a 50-foot diameter primary mirror. Details on this are shockingly lean, with the model put together using two tiny diagrams and one poorly reproduced bit of artwork… and they don’t agree with each other on everything. So a lot of this is guesswork. It’s not even close to done, but I thought some of y’all might be interested. The “tail end” of the operational SBL has what I’m assuming is an SP-100 nuclear reactor for running non-laser systems. The laser itself would be chemical, not nuclear, with around 80 shots worth of fuel.

MOL-ZS 5

 Posted by at 12:49 pm