Sep 282009
 

This illustration has been floating around for a good long while, but unfortuantely, no data seems to come along with it. It is an actual honet-to-Odin General Dynamics PR glossy, not fan art (this particular copy comes from the Jay Miller collection). What it appears to show is an F-111 with a stretched fuselage, and that fuselage stretch containing doors for three or four lift jets (or perhaps 6 or 8… the “doors” visible in this view seem to be on the port side of the fuselage, not on the centerline, indicating that there may be matching features on the starboard side). But the exhaust pipes for the main engines at the tail show no indication of being vectorable, which would argue against VTOL. So just what the hell is this? Are those lift jets, but only used to provide STOL performance? Is it a true VTOL, with some vertical thrust at the tail that’s not apparent in this view? Or are those doors for something else… nto lift jets, but an unconventional weapons system?

Another thought occurs. Along with being streched, the fuselage is also a bit deeper, with unusual “chines” along the lower edge. This presents the appearance of a flying boat hull. Could this be an *amphibious* F-111… with the doors on the upper surface perhaps being secondary inlets used while on the water? Perhaps an amphibious F-111 with additional lift jets to get it clear of the water ASAP?

It would be nice to know.

image191.jpg

image191crop.jpg

If you like this sort aerospace history and/or the other stuff I post, you can support the cause by Buying My Stuff, which includes aerospace drawings and documents, as well as the journal of unbuilt aircraft and spacecraft projects, Aerospace Projects Review. Or you could just Donate.

 Posted by at 10:35 am
Sep 272009
 

<> ABC will be running a miniseries remake of the 1980’s sci-fi epic “V.” But along with the expected updating of the special effect, there’s another major change. I don’t know how in the hell they managed to get this past the suits, but it looks like the new “V” will replace the 1980’s “Alien Nazis” with “Alien Obamists.” Take a look at the trailers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hJRafM1e8Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUgLFJFsFO0

The Visitors hide who they really are behind a mask of friendliness.

The Visistors come as saviors in a time of trouble.

They provide universal health care .

People begin to idolize and worship them.

They “spread Hope

They demand that the press not portray them in a bad light.

They are all about Change.

They gain trust with the promise of friendship, but are really just positioning themselves as the “saviors” of mankind

They are arming themselves with the most powerful weapon out there… devotion.

They’ve been embedded among us for years, causing worldwide instability (Barney Frank is an alien! This explains much)

barack-ovisitor.jpg

 Posted by at 2:37 pm  Tagged with:
Sep 262009
 

This is one of the more bizarre of the series, pretty much inexplicable without some sort of caption. Of which there wasn’t one. Clearly some sort of lunar lander. The “things” on the ends of the arms appear to have transparent bubbles and reflectors, so perhaps this was supposed to be a solar powered… something.

image7.jpg

 Posted by at 11:33 pm
Sep 262009
 

Before the Apollo Command and Service Module designs we’ve come to know were settled upon, numerous American aerospace companies designed their own vehicles to fulfill the Apollo role. General Electric was one of those companies, and their most detailed design was the D-2 configuration. Much like the later Soyuz design (a fact that has caused many to wonder if the design was “copied” by the Soviets), the D-2 consisted of a power & propulsion module at the aft, a re-entry module in the middle and an expendable Mission Module up front, all contained within an aerodynamic shroud. The recovery vehicle portion bears a striking resemblance to the Soyuz version. Unlike the Soyuz, the D-2 would retain the shroud while in space.

Newly released are a series of GE diagrams of their D-2 Apollo spacecraft configuration. You can see more on this drawing package HERE.

sdwg17ani.jpg

 Posted by at 11:20 pm
Sep 262009
 

I love a good layout drawing. A layout drawing actually drawn by hand by a professional is even better. And a layout drawing actually drawn by hand by a professional reproduced by the old cyanotype process to produce a true blueprint can be thing of true beauty.

Witness, for example, this vintage B-29 blueprint. If’n I can somehow work up a frame big enough, it’d look wonderful on a wall. The B-17 diagram (not a true blueprint, but the same sort of large-format diagram in B&W) that came with it would look pretty snazzy as well.

img_0407.jpg

img_0409.jpg

UPDATE: I found a place locally that claims they can scan large format and in color. Woo! 

 Posted by at 10:04 pm
Sep 262009
 

Damned if I can find it, but I swear that around about a year ago someone suggested a mountaintop near Salt Lake City for photography purposes. There was a government (Air Force?) facility up there, with adequate roads. After an hour poking around in the comments and on Google, I can find *nothing* on this. Can anyone help?

 Posted by at 5:31 pm
Sep 262009
 

One of Boeings earliest Dyna Soar designs, dating from about March, 1958. Terribly ’50’s in design, looks like a hood ornament. All angles and fins, including two ventral fins which would have had a hell of a time surviving re-entry. This image is made from two separate kinda blurry photos of presumably the same display model.

814-1012.jpg

 Posted by at 3:06 pm